ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012
Comparing baseline symptom severity and demographics over two time periods in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Early integrated palliative care in cancer patients improves quality of life and encourages discussions about preferences for care at the end of life].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018Article
- Cycling CD34 expression in subpopulations of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines is involved in radioresistance and change in cytokeratin expression profile.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2017Article
- Patient-reported symptoms during radiotherapy : Clinically relevant symptom burden in patients treated with palliative and curative intent.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017Article
- Palliative Radiotherapy with or without Additional Care by a Multidisciplinary Palliative Care Team: A Retrospective Comparison.ISRN oncology · 2014Article
- Skeletal morbidity rates over time in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors reported in bone modifying agents randomised trials.Journal of bone oncology · 2012Article
- Does Marital Status Influence Levels of Anxiety and Depression Before Palliative Radiotherapy?In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Symptom Burden in Patients With Reduced Performance Status at the Start of Palliative Radiotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary objective of this study was to compare the symptom severity in two different patient populations assessed in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic over two time periods spanning 10 years. The secondary objective was to assess any changes in the baseline demographics of these patients.
methodsData were collected from 1999 to 2009. Upon initial presentation to the clinic, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) was administered to patients to capture symptom severity. This validated assessment tool asks patients to score their level of pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, loss of appetite, well-being, and dyspnea on an 11-point Likert scale. Differences between the two patient groups were assessed using chi-squared analysis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
resultsA total of 1,439 patients completed the ESAS from 1999 to 2009. Patients were divided into two time periods 1999-2002 (n = 689) and 2006-2009 (n = 750). Pain, depression, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, drowsiness, and dyspnea were significantly better in 2006-2009 (p < 0.0001). Loss of appetite was not statistically different between the two time periods (p = 0.236). Significantly more patients with genitourinary cancers (p = 0.03) or a referral for a mass (p < 0.0001) were seen in 2006-2009. More patients with breast cancer (p = 0.04) and bone pain (p = 0.0002) were seen in 1999-2002. The median age was significantly higher (70 years vs. 68 years, p = 0.03) for patients seen in 2006-2009. No significant differences were seen in performance status or gender between the two groups.
conclusionThere have been statistically significant lower scores in the severity of the majority of symptoms as scored by the latter patient cohort; however, whether this difference in magnitude is clinically significant is debatable. The reason for referral and demographics in patients sent for palliative radiotherapy has changed over a 10-year period. This may be a reflection of the changes in systemic therapies and improvements in supportive care for patients with advanced cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21360036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.