Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21359226›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The genomic ancestry of individuals from different geographical regions of Brazil is more uniform than expected.

Sérgio D J Pena, Giuliano Di Pietro, Mateus Fuchshuber-Moraes, Julia Pasqualini Genro, Mara H Hutz, Fernanda de Souza Gomes Kehdy, Fabiana Kohlrausch, Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno, Raquel Carvalho Montenegro, Manoel Odorico Moraes and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sérgio D J PenaDepartamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. spena@dcc.ufmg.br
Giuliano Di Pietro
Mateus Fuchshuber-Moraes
Julia Pasqualini Genro
Mara H Hutz
Fernanda de Souza Gomes Kehdy
Fabiana Kohlrausch
Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno
Raquel Carvalho Montenegro
Manoel Odorico Moraes
Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes
Milene Raiol de Moraes
Elida B Ojopi
Jamila A Perini
Clarice Racciopi
Andrea Kely Campos Ribeiro-Dos-Santos
Fabrício Rios-Santos
Marco A Romano-Silva
Vinicius A Sortica
Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on pre-DNA racial/color methodology, clinical and pharmacological trials have traditionally considered the different geographical regions of Brazil as being very heterogeneous. We wished to ascertain how such diversity of regional color categories correlated with ancestry. Using a panel of 40 validated ancestry-informative insertion-deletion DNA polymorphisms we estimated individually the European, African and Amerindian ancestry components of 934 self-categorized White, Brown or Black Brazilians from the four most populous regions of the Country. We unraveled great ancestral diversity between and within the different regions. Especially, color categories in the northern part of Brazil diverged significantly in their ancestry proportions from their counterparts in the southern part of the Country, indicating that diverse regional semantics were being used in the self-classification as White, Brown or Black. To circumvent these regional subjective differences in color perception, we estimated the general ancestry proportions of each of the four regions in a form independent of color considerations. For that, we multiplied the proportions of a given ancestry in a given color category by the official census information about the proportion of that color category in the specific region, to arrive at a "total ancestry" estimate. Once such a calculation was performed, there emerged a much higher level of uniformity than previously expected. In all regions studied, the European ancestry was predominant, with proportions ranging from 60.6% in the Northeast to 77.7% in the South. We propose that the immigration of six million Europeans to Brazil in the 19th and 20th centuries--a phenomenon described and intended as the "whitening of Brazil"--is in large part responsible for dissipating previous ancestry dissimilarities that reflected region-specific population histories. These findings, of both clinical and sociological importance for Brazil, should also be relevant to other countries with ancestrally admixed populations.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanBrazilCohort StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP3AFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeGeographyHumansMaleMetagenomicsMixed Function OxygenasesPhylogeographyRacial GroupsSkin PigmentationVitamin K Epoxide ReductasesCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3AMixed Function OxygenasesVitamin K Epoxide Reductases

Identifiers

PMID21359226
PMCPMC3040205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.