ArticleJournal of oncology practice2010
Does multidisciplinary care enhance the management of advanced breast cancer?: evaluation of advanced breast cancer multidisciplinary team meetings.
Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Advanced Practice Nurse Coordinated Multidisciplinary Intervention for Patients with Late-Stage Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of palliative medicine · 2015Trial
- Shared decision-making in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I-IV: perspectives from patients and clinicians.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- Impact of multidisciplinary team on the pattern of care for brain metastasis from breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Multigene signatures for early breast cancer in clinical practice: A report of the Lombardy genomic assays for breast cancer working group.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Multidisciplinary Approach to Older Adults with Hematologic Malignancies-a Paradigm Shift.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022Review
- Exploring non-physician care professionals' roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Compliance with multidisciplinary team recommendations and disease outcomes in early breast cancer patients: An analysis of 4501 consecutive patients.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Effect of Multidisciplinary Case Conferences on Physician Decision Making: Breast Diagnostic Rounds.Cureus · 2016Article
- Body Image of Women with Breast Cancer After Mastectomy: A Qualitative Research.The journal of breast health · 2016Article
- ReCAP: Impact of Multidisciplinary Care on Processes of Cancer Care: A Multi-Institutional Study.Journal of oncology practice · 2016Article
- National consensus in China on diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Review
- A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the contribution of the advanced breast cancer (ABC) multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) to patient care and clinical outcomes.
methodsMembers of ABC MDMs at two health services completed questionnaires in November 2007. The questionnaire asked about the performance of the MDMs and their contribution to improvement in patient care in five domains: medical management, psychosocial care, palliative care, care in the community, and benefits for team members. A final section covered the perceived value and importance of the MDM in patient management. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, mean, and standard deviation) were used to summarize the performance, improvement, and importance scores.
resultsA total of 27 multidisciplinary team members (73%) completed the questionnaire. The MDM performed best in medical management (mean performance score out of 5 [M] = 3.78) and palliative care (M = 3.77). These were also the areas that were most improved through the MDM. Benefits to team members and care in the community (both M = 3.05) ranked lowest by both measures. The MDM provided the most benefit for patient management in the areas of "awareness of services available" (M = 4.32), "efficiency of referrals" (M = 4.27) and "supportive care for patients" (M = 4.27). "Awareness of services available," "psychological care for patients," and "continuity of care" were considered the most important (M = 4.64).
conclusionThe study provides evidence that MDMs make an important contribution to the logistical and medical management of patients with advanced breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.