Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21358951›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2010

Enhancing prostate cancer care through the multidisciplinary clinic approach: a 15-year experience.

Leonard G Gomella, Jianqing Lin, Jean Hoffman-Censits, Patricia Dugan, Fran Guiles, Costas D Lallas, Jaspreet Singh, Peter McCue, Timothy Showalter, Richard K Valicenti and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Best Patient Care Practices for Administering PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The impact of a multidisciplinary small renal mass clinic on patient treatment decisions.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Decision Support and Shared Decision Making About Active Surveillance Versus Active Treatment Among Men Diagnosed with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonard G GomellaKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jianqing Lin
Jean Hoffman-Censits
Patricia Dugan
Fran Guiles
Costas D Lallas
Jaspreet Singh
Peter McCue
Timothy Showalter
Richard K Valicenti
Adam Dicker
Edouard J Trabulsi
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on the 15-year prostate cancer experience of our multidisciplinary genitourinary cancer clinic established in 1996 at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) -designated Jefferson Kimmel Cancer Center. Patients with genitourinary cancers were evaluated weekly by multiple specialists at a single site, and we focus on the 83% of patients with prostate cancer. To our knowledge, our multidisciplinary genitourinary cancer clinic is the longest continuously operating center of its kind at an NCI Cancer Center in the United States.

methodsData from Jefferson's Oncology Data Services were compared to SEER prostate cancer outcomes. Data on treatment changes in localized disease, patient satisfaction, and related parameters were also assessed.

resultsTen-year survival data approach 100% in stage I and II prostate cancer. Ten-year data for stage III (T3 N0M0) and stage IV (T4 N0M0) disease show that our institutional survival rate exceeds SEER. There is a shift toward robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and a slight decrease in brachytherapy relative to external beam radiation therapy in localized disease. Patient satisfaction is high as measured by survey instruments.

conclusionOur long-term experience suggests a benefit of the multidisciplinary clinic approach to prostate cancer, most pronounced for high-risk, locally advanced disease. A high level of satisfaction with this patient-centered model is seen. The multidisciplinary clinic approach to prostate cancer may enhance outcomes and possibly reduce treatment regret through a coordinated presentation of all therapeutic options. This clinic model serves as an interdisciplinary educational tool for patients, their families, and our trainees and supports clinical trial participation.

Identifiers

PMID21358951
PMCPMC2988679
OpenAlexW2098879002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.