Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21358807›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2011

A randomised controlled trial of ion-exchange water softeners for the treatment of eczema in children.

Kim S Thomas, Tara Dean, Caroline O'Leary, Tracey H Sach, Karin Koller, Anthony Frost, Hywel C Williams, SWET Trial Team

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Defining "Flares" in Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Atopic Dermatitis Across Shades of Skin.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023
    Review
  11. Water hardness and atopic dermatitis in the first year of life in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Detecting Eczema Areas in Digital Images: An Impossible Task?JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Atopic dermatitis and bathing.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of Environmental Exposures in Atopic Dermatitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. kim.thomas@nottingham.ac.uk
Tara Dean
Caroline O'Leary
Tracey H Sach
Karin Koller
Anthony Frost
Hywel C Williams
SWET Trial Team

Funding

Department of Health 05/16/01Department of Health HTA/05/16/01Department of Health HTA_9019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological studies and anecdotal reports suggest a possible link between household use of hard water and atopic eczema. We sought to test whether installation of an ion-exchange water softener in the home can improve eczema in children. METHODS AND

findingsThis was an observer-blind randomised trial involving 336 children (aged 6 months to 16 years) with moderate/severe atopic eczema. All lived in hard water areas (≥200 mg/l calcium carbonate). Participants were randomised to either installation of an ion-exchange water softener plus usual eczema care, or usual eczema care alone. The primary outcome was change in eczema severity (Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis Score, SASSAD) at 12 weeks, measured by research nurses who were blinded to treatment allocation. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population. Eczema severity improved for both groups during the trial. The mean change in SASSAD at 12 weeks was -5.0 (20% improvement) for the water softener group and -5.7 (22% improvement) for the usual care group (mean difference 0.66, 95% confidence interval -1.37 to 2.69, p = 0.53). No between-group differences were noted in the use of topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors.

conclusionsWater softeners provided no additional benefit to usual care in this study population. Small but statistically significant differences were found in some secondary outcomes as reported by parents, but it is likely that such improvements were the result of response bias, since participants were aware of their treatment allocation. A detailed report for this trial is also available at http://www.hta.ac.uk.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN71423189 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Indexed as

Water SofteningAdolescentBathsChildChild, PreschoolEczemaFemaleHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID21358807
PMCPMC3039684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.