Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21358689›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011

The EBMT activity survey 2009: trends over the past 5 years.

H Baldomero, M Gratwohl, A Gratwohl, A Tichelli, D Niederwieser, A Madrigal, K Frauendorfer, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation EBMT

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ABO-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. G-CSF-primed BM for allogeneic SCT: revisited.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015
    Review
  20. Hematopoietic SCT in Iranian children 1991-2012.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H BaldomeroEBMT Activity Survey Office, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. hematology@uhbs.ch
M Gratwohl
A Gratwohl
A Tichelli
D Niederwieser
A Madrigal
K Frauendorfer
European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation EBMT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Six hundred and twenty-four centers from 43 countries reported a total of 31,322 hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) to this 2009 European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) survey with 28,033 first transplants (41% allogeneic, 59% autologous). The main indications were leukemias (31%; 92% allogeneic), lymphomas (58%; 12% allogeneic), solid tumors (5%; 6% allogeneic) and non-malignant disorders (6%; 88% allogeneic). There were more unrelated than HLA-identical sibling donors (51 vs 43%) for allogeneic HSCT; the proportion of peripheral blood as stem cell source was 99% for autologous and 71% for allogeneic HSCT. Allogeneic and autologous HSCT continued to increase by about 1000 HSCT per year since 2004. Patterns of increase were distinct and different. In a trend analysis, allogeneic HSCT increased in all World Bank Categories (P=0.01, two sided; all categories), autologous HSCT increased in middle- (P=0.01, two sided) and low-income (P=0.01, two sided) countries. EBMT practice guidelines appeared to have an impact on trend, with a clear increase in absolute numbers within the categories 'standard' and 'clinical option' for both allogeneic and autologous HSCT (P=0.01, two sided; for both allogeneic and autologous HSCT) and a clear decrease in autologous HSCT for the 'developmental' and 'generally not recommended' indications (P=0.01, two sided). These data illustrate the status and trends of HST in Europe.

Indexed as

Data CollectionEuropeHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID21358689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.