Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21358182›Full record

ArticleAdvances in oto-rhino-laryngology2011

Towards an etiologic diagnosis: assessing the patient with hearing loss.

J Jerry, John S Oghalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Current treatment options in pediatrics · 2016
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive outcomes and familial stress after cochlear implantation in deaf children with and without developmental delays.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Jerry
John S Oghalai

Funding

Outcomes in Children with Developmental Delay and Deafness: a Randomized TrialR01DC010075 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI OGHALAI, JOHN S · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the clinical approach taken towards identification of the cause of hearing loss in children. A brief overview of the universal newborn hearing screening program is presented. Discussion is then focused on clinical elements of the diagnostic process with emphasis on the importance of the history, physical examination, and audiologic testing. The utility and appropriateness of additional diagnostic testing is considered, particularly with regards to the incorporation of diagnostic radiologic imaging and genetic testing. In the course of these discussions, the genetic and non-genetic causes of pediatric hearing loss are reviewed. Finally, the implications of a definitive identification of hearing loss etiology are considered.

Indexed as

AudiometryDiagnostic ImagingElectrocardiographyGenetic TestingHearing LossHumansInfant, NewbornMedical History TakingNeonatal ScreeningPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID21358182
PMCPMC3597103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.