ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2011
Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Science and prizes : A case for rethinking the criteria for prizes in science (and for rewarding important discoveries in bacterial physiology).EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2020Article
- Article
- Reviewing papers as you would like your papers to be reviewed.Molecular biology of the cell · 2019Article
- How to review a paper for Archives of Plastic Surgery, communicate as a reviewer, and handle disagreements with authors.Archives of plastic surgery · 2018Article
- Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2014Article
- Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor.Molecular biology of the cell · 2013Article
- Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay.The Australasian medical journal · 2012Article
- MBoC 2011: same values, improved feng shui.Molecular biology of the cell · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.