Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21357574›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

aCGH.Spline--an R package for aCGH dye bias normalization.

Tomas W Fitzgerald, Lee D Larcombe, Solena Le Scouarnec, Stephen Clayton, Diana Rajan, Nigel P Carter, Richard Redon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomas W FitzgeraldWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. tf2@sanger.ac.uk
Lee D Larcombe
Solena Le Scouarnec
Stephen Clayton
Diana Rajan
Nigel P Carter
Richard Redon

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT077008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe careful normalization of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data is of critical importance for the accurate detection of copy number changes. The difference in labelling affinity between the two fluorophores used in aCGH-usually Cy5 and Cy3-can be observed as a bias within the intensity distributions. If left unchecked, this bias is likely to skew data interpretation during downstream analysis and lead to an increased number of false discoveries.

resultsIn this study, we have developed aCGH.Spline, a natural cubic spline interpolation method followed by linear interpolation of outlier values, which is able to remove a large portion of the dye bias from large aCGH datasets in a quick and efficient manner.

conclusionsWe have shown that removing this bias and reducing the experimental noise has a strong positive impact on the ability to detect accurately both copy number variation (CNV) and copy number alterations (CNA).

Indexed as

SoftwareCarbocyaninesComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsFluorescent DyesCarbocyaninescyanine dye 3cyanine dye 5Fluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID21357574
PMCPMC3077069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.