Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21357393›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2011

Refinement of the X-linked nonsyndromic high-grade myopia locus MYP1 on Xq28 and exclusion of 13 known positional candidate genes by direct sequencing.

Uppala Ratnamala, Robert Lyle, Rakesh Rawal, Raminder Singh, Satti Vishnupriya, Pamini Himabindu, Vittal Rao, Somesh Aggarwal, Prasuna Paluru, Lucia Bartoloni and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Insight fromGenes · 2022
    Article
  6. Myopia Genetics and Heredity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Myopia in India.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Residual Cone Structure in Patients With X-Linked Cone Opsin Mutations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
  11. Exome Sequence Analysis of 14 Families With High Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Uppala RatnamalaDepartment of Pharmacology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Robert Lyle
Rakesh Rawal
Raminder Singh
Satti Vishnupriya
Pamini Himabindu
Vittal Rao
Somesh Aggarwal
Prasuna Paluru
Lucia Bartoloni
Terri L Young
Ariane Paoloni-Giacobino
Michael A Morris
Swapan K Nath
Stylianos E Antonarakis
Uppala Radhakrishna

Funding

The Molecular Genetics of High MyopiaR01EY014685 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI YOUNG, TERRI LOIS · 2003 to 2017
$8.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyopia is a common vision problem affecting almost one third of the world's population. It can occur as an isolated genetic condition or be associated with other anomalies and/or syndromes. Seventeen myopia loci have been identified on various chromosomes; however, no specific gene mutations have yet been identified.

methodsTwo large multigeneration Asian Indian pedigrees (UR006 and UR077) with isolated, nonsyndromic myopia were studied, in which the condition appeared to segregate as an X-linked recessive trait (MYP1; MIM 310460). The degree of myopia was variable in both families, ranging from -6 to -23 D (mean, -8.48 D) with the majority >7.0 D. To map the myopia locus in these families, polymorphic microsatellite markers covering the entire X chromosome were used in linkage analyses performed on 42 genomic DNA samples (13 affected and 29 normal) from both families.

resultsMarker DXYS154, which is located within the pseudoautosomal region in distal Xq28 (PAR2; pseudoautosomal region 2), gave a combined maximum LOD score of 5.3 at = 0 under an autosomal recessive model. Other markers in the region (near but not within the PAR2 region) that showed no recombination with the phenotype in both the families included DXS1108, DXS8087, and F8i13.

conclusionsObservation of recombination in family UR006 refined the disease locus to a ∼1.25-Mb region flanked by the proximal marker DXS1073 and distal marker DXYS154. Mutation search in exons and splice junctions of candidate genes CTAG2, GAB3, MPP1, F8Bver, FUNDC2, VBP1, RAB39B, CLIC2, TMLHE, SYBL, IL9R, SPRY3, and CXYorf1 did not detect a pathogenic or predisposing variant.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkagePedigreeAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, XDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenes, DominantGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedHaplotypesHumansIndiaLod Score

Identifiers

PMID21357393
PMCPMC3176007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.