Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21357302›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Attributable hospital cost and antifungal treatment of invasive fungal diseases in high-risk hematology patients: an economic modeling approach.

Michelle R Ananda-Rajah, Allen Cheng, C Orla Morrissey, Tim Spelman, Michael Dooley, A Munro Neville, Monica Slavin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04619147 (Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Following Stem Cell Transplant), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04619147 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Following Stem Cell Transplant

TypeobservationalSponsorPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, AustraliaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsInvasive Fungal Infections, Stem Cell Transplant ComplicationsArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adherence to Antifungal Guidelines in Malignant Hematology Patients: A Review of the Literature.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Pathogen-Specific T Cells Beyond CMV, EBV and Adenovirus.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019
    Review
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  18. Physicochemical stability of voriconazole in elastomeric devices.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle R Ananda-RajahInfectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Health, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. m.ananda-rajah@alfred.org.au
Allen Cheng
C Orla Morrissey
Tim Spelman
Michael Dooley
A Munro Neville
Monica Slavin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using patient-level data to determine the attributable cost of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are few. Using a case-control study with activity-based costing of patients admitted to a quaternary hospital from 2002 to 2007, we determined attributable hospitalization cost (and 12 weeks thereafter), length of stay (LOS), and costly antifungal treatment (C-AT; liposomal amphotericin B, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin), expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs) per IFD episode, in patients with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Matching criteria and median regression modeling controlled for confounding variables, including LOS prior to IFD onset. Multiple mycoses were identified in 43 matched case-control pairs (n=86). A separate sensitivity analysis included 22 unmatched patients. IFD status was associated with a median excess cost of AU$30,957 (95% confidence interval [CI]=AU$2,368 to AU$59,546; P=0.034), approximating at purchasing power parity US$21,203 (95% CI=US$1,622 to US$40,784) and €15,788 (95% CI=€1,208 to €30,368), increasing to AU$80,291 (95% CI=AU$33,636 to AU$126,946; P=0.001), i.e., US$54,993 (95% CI=US$23,038 to US$86,948) and €40,948 (95% CI=€17,154 to €64,742), with intensive care unit (ICU) requirement. Cost determinants were pharmacy costs (64%; P<0.001) inclusive of antifungal treatment (27%; P<0.001) and ward costs (27%; P=0.091), with proportions persisting through 12 weeks for 25 surviving matched pairs (pharmacy, 60% [P=0.12]; ward, 31% [P=0.21]). Median LOS was not significantly increased unless unmatched patients were included (8 days, 95% CI=1.8 to 14 days; P=0.012). Excess C-ATs were 17 DDDs (95% CI=15 to 19 DDDs; P<0.001) per case patient and 19 DDDs (95% CI=16 to 22 DDDs; P<0.001) per ICU patient. The sensitivity analysis was confirmatory (for median cost, AU$29,441, 95% CI=AU$5,571 to AU$53,310, P=0.016; for C-AT, 17 DDDs, 95% CI=16 to 18 DDDs, P<0.001). IFD results in increased hospital and ICU costs, with pharmacy costs, including antifungal treatment, being major determinants. Consumption of costly antifungal drugs may be a novel resource metric with wider generalizability than cost alone.

Indexed as

HematologyModels, EconomicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFemaleHospital CostsHumansLength of StayLipopeptidesMaleMiddle AgedAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID21357302
PMCPMC3088208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.