Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21356119›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

A computational framework for proteome-wide pursuit and prediction of metalloproteins using ICP-MS and MS/MS data.

W Andrew Lancaster, Jeremy L Praissman, Farris L Poole, Aleksandar Cvetkovic, Angeli Lal Menon, Joseph W Scott, Francis E Jenney, Michael P Thorgersen, Ewa Kalisiak, Junefredo V Apon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proteomic strategies to interrogate the Fe-S proteome.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Radiation resistance in thermophiles: mechanisms and applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Metals in biology: defining metalloproteomes.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W Andrew LancasterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jeremy L Praissman
Farris L Poole
Aleksandar Cvetkovic
Angeli Lal Menon
Joseph W Scott
Francis E Jenney
Michael P Thorgersen
Ewa Kalisiak
Junefredo V Apon
Sunia A Trauger
Gary Siuzdak
John A Tainer
Michael W W Adams
University of Georgia · USScripps Research Institute · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetal-containing proteins comprise a diverse and sizable category within the proteomes of organisms, ranging from proteins that use metals to catalyze reactions to proteins in which metals play key structural roles. Unfortunately, reliably predicting that a protein will contain a specific metal from its amino acid sequence is not currently possible. We recently developed a generally-applicable experimental technique for finding metalloproteins on a genome-wide scale. Applying this metal-directed protein purification approach (ICP-MS and MS/MS based) to the prototypical microbe Pyrococcus furiosus conclusively demonstrated the extent and diversity of the uncharacterized portion of microbial metalloproteomes since a majority of the observed metal peaks could not be assigned to known or predicted metalloproteins. However, even using this technique, it is not technically feasible to purify to homogeneity all metalloproteins in an organism. In order to address these limitations and complement the metal-directed protein purification, we developed a computational infrastructure and statistical methodology to aid in the pursuit and identification of novel metalloproteins.

resultsWe demonstrate that our methodology enables predictions of metal-protein interactions using an experimental data set derived from a chromatography fractionation experiment in which 870 proteins and 10 metals were measured over 2,589 fractions. For each of the 10 metals, cobalt, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, tungsten, uranium, vanadium, and zinc, clusters of proteins frequently occurring in metal peaks (of a specific metal) within the fractionation space were defined. This resulted in predictions that there are from 5 undiscovered vanadium- to 13 undiscovered cobalt-containing proteins in Pyrococcus furiosus. Molybdenum and nickel were chosen for additional assessment producing lists of genes predicted to encode metalloproteins or metalloprotein subunits, 22 for nickel including seven from known nickel-proteins, and 20 for molybdenum including two from known molybdo-proteins. The uncharacterized proteins are prime candidates for metal-based purification or recombinant approaches to validate these predictions.

conclusionsWe conclude that the largely uncharacterized extent of native metalloproteomes can be revealed through analysis of the co-occurrence of metals and proteins across a fractionation space. This can significantly impact our understanding of metallobiochemistry, disease mechanisms, and metal toxicity, with implications for bioremediation, medicine and other fields.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinElectronic Data ProcessingMetalloproteinsMetalsMolybdenumNickelProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteomePyrococcus furiosusBacterial ProteinsMetalloproteinsMetalsMolybdenumNickelProteome

Identifiers

PMID21356119
PMCPMC3058030
OpenAlexW2087279848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.