ArticleBiophysical journal2011
Assisted peptide folding by surface pattern recognition.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Measurement of Surface Charge Effects on the Stability of a Surface-Bound Biopolymer.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2018Article
- Effects of crowding on the stability of a surface-tethered biopolymer: an experimental study of folding in a highly crowded regime.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2014Article
- Effect of interactions with the chaperonin cavity on protein folding and misfolding.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2014Article
- Spontaneous membrane-translocating peptide adsorption at silica surfaces: a molecular dynamics study.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Identification of minimally interacting modules in an intrinsically disordered protein.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Smoothing of the GB1 hairpin folding landscape by interfacial confinement.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natively disordered proteins belong to a unique class of biomolecules whose function is related to their flexibility and their ability to adopt desired conformations upon binding to substrates. In some cases these proteins can bind multiple partners, which can lead to distinct structures and promiscuity in functions. In other words, the capacity to recognize molecular patterns on the substrate is often essential for the folding and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. Biomolecular pattern recognition is extremely relevant both in vivo (e.g., for oligomerization, immune response, induced folding, substrate binding, and molecular switches) and in vitro (e.g., for biosensing, catalysis, chromatography, and implantation). Here, we use a minimalist computational model system to investigate how polar/nonpolar patterns on a surface can induce the folding of an otherwise unstructured peptide. We show that a model peptide that exists in the bulk as a molten globular state consisting of many interconverting structures can fold into either a helix-coil-helix or an extended helix structure in the presence of a complementary designed patterned surface at low hydrophobicity (3.7%) or a uniform surface at high hydrophobicity (50%). However, we find that a carefully chosen surface pattern can bind to and catalyze the folding of a natively unfolded protein much more readily or effectively than a surface with a noncomplementary or uniform distribution of hydrophobic residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.