Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21354028›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2011

Effects of montelukast on patients with asthma after experimental inoculation with human rhinovirus 16.

Kirsten M Kloepfer, Jennifer P DeMore, Rose F Vrtis, Cheri A Swenson, Katie L Gaworski, Jack A Bork, Michael D Evans, James E Gern

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00359073 (Effect of Montelukast on Experimentally-Induced RV16 Infection in Volunteers With Mild Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00359073 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Montelukast on Experimentally-Induced RV16 Infection in Volunteers With Mild Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2006 to 2009Enrolled25ConditionsAsthmaArmsmontelukast, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The common cold: potential for future prevention or cure.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten M KloepferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. kkloepfer@medicine.wisc.edu
Jennifer P DeMore
Rose F Vrtis
Cheri A Swenson
Katie L Gaworski
Jack A Bork
Michael D Evans
James E Gern
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Wisconsin Allergy Research Training (WISCART) ProgramT32AI007635 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI James E. Gern, DANIEL J JACKSON · 2000 to 2026
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeukotrienes are induced by viral infections.

objectivesTo determine whether treatment with montelukast would improve asthma disease control in patients with mild allergic asthma during an experimentally induced rhinovirus infection.

methodsPatients with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive treatment with either montelukast or placebo, and 7 days later both groups were inoculated with human rhinovirus 16. Patients were evaluated at baseline, during the acute infection phase, and during the recovery phase for asthma and cold symptoms by questionnaire. Sputum, nasal lavage fluid, and blood were analyzed for viral shedding and cellular inflammation, and peak expiratory flow was measured daily.

resultsA total of 19 patients (11 in the placebo group and 8 in the active group) completed the study. No significant differences were found in asthma control and cold symptom scores between the control and treatment groups. The change in peak expiratory flow from the randomization to acute illness phase was greater in the placebo group than the treatment group (mean, -22 vs 0 L/min; P = .05). During the recovery phase, the percentage of sputum eosinophils increased in the placebo group and remained at baseline levels in the montelukast group (median, 2.7% vs 0.2%; P = .05 between groups).

conclusionsIn this pilot study, montelukast did not improve asthma control or cold symptom scores caused by experimental rhinovirus infection. Analysis of secondary outcomes suggests that montelukast may prevent reductions in lung function and increases in sputum eosinophils caused by common cold infections. Further studies are needed to determine whether these effects are associated with clinically significant improvements in health outcomes during natural colds.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00359073.

Indexed as

AcetatesAsthmaCommon ColdCyclopropanesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLeukotriene AntagonistsMalePilot ProjectsQuinolinesRespiratory Function TestsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRhinovirusRNA, ViralSulfidesAcetatesCyclopropanesLeukotriene AntagonistsmontelukastQuinolinesRNA, ViralSulfides

Identifiers

PMID21354028
PMCPMC3104731
OpenAlexW2047634257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.