Trial reportAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2011
Effects of montelukast on patients with asthma after experimental inoculation with human rhinovirus 16.
Trial report in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00359073 (Effect of Montelukast on Experimentally-Induced RV16 Infection in Volunteers With Mild Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Montelukast on Experimentally-Induced RV16 Infection in Volunteers With Mild Asthma
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Montelukast and Telmisartan as Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- In Vitro Effects of 5-Lipoxygenase Pathway Inhibition on Rhinovirus-Associated Bronchial Epithelial Inflammation.Pulmonary therapy · 2021Article
- Montelukast Drug May Improve COVID-19 Prognosis: A Review of Evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 expression identifies a subset of neutrophils during the antiviral response that contributes to postviral atopic airway disease.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018Article
- Virus-induced modulation of lower airway diseases: pathogenesis and pharmacologic approaches to treatment.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2015Review
- Utility of animal and in vivo experimental infection of humans with rhinoviruses in the development of therapeutic agents for viral exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2015Review
- The common cold: potential for future prevention or cure.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2014Review
- Epidemiology of virus-induced asthma exacerbations: with special reference to the role of human rhinovirus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Review
- Retrospective cohort study of leukotriene receptor antagonist therapy for preventing upper respiratory infection-induced acute asthma exacerbations.Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeukotrienes are induced by viral infections.
objectivesTo determine whether treatment with montelukast would improve asthma disease control in patients with mild allergic asthma during an experimentally induced rhinovirus infection.
methodsPatients with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive treatment with either montelukast or placebo, and 7 days later both groups were inoculated with human rhinovirus 16. Patients were evaluated at baseline, during the acute infection phase, and during the recovery phase for asthma and cold symptoms by questionnaire. Sputum, nasal lavage fluid, and blood were analyzed for viral shedding and cellular inflammation, and peak expiratory flow was measured daily.
resultsA total of 19 patients (11 in the placebo group and 8 in the active group) completed the study. No significant differences were found in asthma control and cold symptom scores between the control and treatment groups. The change in peak expiratory flow from the randomization to acute illness phase was greater in the placebo group than the treatment group (mean, -22 vs 0 L/min; P = .05). During the recovery phase, the percentage of sputum eosinophils increased in the placebo group and remained at baseline levels in the montelukast group (median, 2.7% vs 0.2%; P = .05 between groups).
conclusionsIn this pilot study, montelukast did not improve asthma control or cold symptom scores caused by experimental rhinovirus infection. Analysis of secondary outcomes suggests that montelukast may prevent reductions in lung function and increases in sputum eosinophils caused by common cold infections. Further studies are needed to determine whether these effects are associated with clinically significant improvements in health outcomes during natural colds.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00359073.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.