Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21353638›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2011

Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits in vivo.

Matthew E Carter, Luis de Lecea

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A synthetic synthesis to explore animal evolution and development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A neuroscientist's guide to transgenic mice and other genetic tools.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer-Induced Sleep Disruption.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Neuronal Mechanisms for Sleep/Wake Regulation and Modulatory Drive.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew E CarterNeurosciences Program and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. carterme@stanford.edu
Luis de Lecea
Stanford University · US

Funding

Optogenetic Control of Hypocretin Neurons and StressR01MH083702 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DE LECEA, LUIS · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Hypocretin and Drug AddictionR01DA021880 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DE LECEA, LUIS · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
The Role of Hypocretins in the Regulation of Stress and ArousalF31MH083439 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARTER, MATTHEW E · 2008 to 2010
$98k
NIDA NIH HHS DA021880NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021880NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH083439NIMH NIH HHS F31MH83439NIMH NIH HHS MH083702NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of light-activated optogenetic probes allows for the identification and manipulation of specific neural populations and their connections in awake animals with unprecedented spatial and temporal precision. This review describes the use of optogenetic tools to investigate neurons and neural circuits in vivo. We describe the current panel of optogenetic probes, methods of targeting these probes to specific cell types in the nervous system, and strategies of photostimulating cells in awake, behaving animals. Finally, we survey the application of optogenetic tools to studying functional neuroanatomy, behavior and the etiology and treatment of various neurological disorders.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsGenetic EngineeringHumansLuminescent ProteinsModels, BiologicalNervous SystemNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsOpsinsPhotic StimulationLuminescent ProteinsNeurotransmitter AgentsOpsins

Identifiers

PMID21353638
PMCPMC3148823
OpenAlexW1972334601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.