Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21352941›Full record

ArticleVaccine2011

A comparative analysis of HIV-specific mucosal/systemic T cell immunity and avidity following rDNA/rFPV and poxvirus-poxvirus prime boost immunisations.

Charani Ranasinghe, Fiona Eyers, John Stambas, David B Boyle, Ian A Ramshaw, Alistair J Ramsay

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Charani RanasingheThe John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Charani.Ranasinghe@anu.edu.au
Fiona Eyers
John Stambas
David B Boyle
Ian A Ramshaw
Alistair J Ramsay
Australian National University · AUAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AULouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

HIV Vaccine Design and Development Teams-26605395N01AI005395 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · 2000 to 2004
$3.2M
Vaccination strategies against pulmonary tuberculosisR01AI058810 · NIAID · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI RAMSAY, ALISTAIR JOHN · 2004 to 2010
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI005395NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058810NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-058810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we have firstly compared a range of recombinant DNA poxvirus prime-boost immunisation strategies and shown that combined intramuscular (i.m.) 2× DNA-HIV/intranasal (i.n.) 2× FPV-HIV prime-boost immunisation can generate high-level of HIV-specific systemic (spleen) and mucosal (genito-rectal nodes, vaginal tissues and lung tissues) T cell responses and HIV-1 p24 Gag-specific serum IgG1, IgG2a and mucosal IgG, SIgA responses in vaginal secretions in BALB/c mice. Data indicate that following rDNA priming, two rFPV booster immunisations were necessary to generate good antibody and mucosal T cell immunity. This data also revealed that mucosal uptake of recombinant fowl pox (rFPV) was far superior to plasmid DNA. To further evaluate CD8+ T cell immunity, i.m. 2× DNA-HIV/i.n. 1× FPV-HIV immunisation strategy was directly compared with single shot poxvirus/poxvirus, i.n. FPV-HIV/i.m. VV-HIV immunisation. Results indicate that the latter strategy was able to generate strong sustained HIV-specific CD8+ T cells with higher avidity, broader cytokine/chemokine profiles and better protection following influenza-K(d)Gag(197-205) challenge compared to rDNA poxvirus prime-boost strategy. Our findings further substantiate the importance of vector selection/combination, order and route of delivery when designing effective vaccines for HIV-1.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAdministration, IntranasalAIDS VaccinesAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleFowlpox virusHIV AntibodiesHIV Core Protein p24HIV InfectionsImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunization, SecondaryInjections, IntramuscularInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2AIDS VaccinesHIV AntibodiesHIV Core Protein p24Interferon-gammaInterleukin-2p24 protein, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1Vaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21352941
PMCPMC3244379
OpenAlexW2047581118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.