Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21352225›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2011

Translating medical evidence to promote informed health care decisions.

Lauren McCormack, Katherine Treiman, Carla Bann, Pamela Williams-Piehota, David Driscoll, Jon Poehlman, Cindy Soloe, Kathleen Lohr, Stacey Sheridan, Carol Golin and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren McCormackRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. lmac@rti.org
Katherine Treiman
Carla Bann
Pamela Williams-Piehota
David Driscoll
Jon Poehlman
Cindy Soloe
Kathleen Lohr
Stacey Sheridan
Carol Golin
Samuel Cykert
Russell Harris
RTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMoses H Cone Memorial Hospital · USUniversity of Alaska Anchorage · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of a community-based intervention on decisions about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening using multiple measures of informed decision making (IDM). DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingNonequivalent control group time series design collecting primary data in late 2004 and 2005. STUDY

designWe developed a multimodal intervention designed to convey the medical uncertainty about the benefits of PSA screening and early treatment and the limited predictive ability of both the PSA test and pathological specimens collected from prostate biopsy. We examined (1) patients' recognition that there is a decision to be made about PSA screening, (2) prostate cancer knowledge levels, (3) their preferred and actual levels of participation in decision making about screening at three points in time, and (4) screening decision. DATA COLLECTION: Baseline data collection occurred in community-based organizations. These organizations served as recruiting sources and as sites for the intervention. We collected follow-up data by mail with telephone reminders. PRINCIPAL

findingsOur intervention was associated with greater recognition of the PSA test as a decision to be made, levels of knowledge, both preferred and actual levels of involvement in decision making, but did not have an impact on the screening decision.

conclusionsCommunity-based interventions can influence key measures of IDM about PSA screening.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansMaleMass ScreeningMen's HealthMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient ParticipationProstate-Specific AntigenSelf EfficacySocioeconomic FactorsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21352225
PMCPMC3165184
OpenAlexW1562666765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.