Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21350585›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2011

Improvements in 25 Years of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy.

G H van Welsenes, C J W Borleffs, J B van Rees, J Z Atary, J Thijssen, E E van der Wall, M J Schalij

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent temporal trends in hospital costs for non-surgical patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Article
  6. Progression of infarct-mediated arrhythmogenesis in a rodent model of heart failure.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators - the past, present and future.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mortality decrease from cardiovascular disease in Europe: 50 % in 30 years!Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2013
    Article
  12. Implementation of guidelines for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in clinical practice: Which patients do benefit?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2013
    Article
  13. Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Fresh arrhythmia news: suitable for daily use?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G H van WelsenesDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, C5-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
C J W Borleffs
J B van Rees
J Z Atary
J Thijssen
E E van der Wall
M J Schalij
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1980, Dr. Michel Mirowski and his team inserted the first implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in a patient. Initially, ICD therapy was not widely accepted, and many physicians actually considered this therapy unethical. Large secondary and primary prevention trials, demonstrating a beneficial effect of ICD therapy in selected patients not only on arrhythmic death but also on all-cause mortality, stimulated a rapid growth in the number of implants and increased patient's and physician's acceptance. Improvements in size and weight, arrhythmia discrimination capabilities, battery technology, shock waveform and output, monitoring capabilities and defibrillator electrode technology eventually resulted in the current large number of yearly implants. Today, almost 40 years after the conception of the ICD and 25 years after the first human implant, ICD therapy is the treatment of choice for patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias either as secondary or primary prevention. Furthermore, with the more recent addition of resynchronisation therapy to standard ICD therapy, it became possible to treat selected patients with advanced symptoms of heart failure and to lower the risk of sudden death.

Identifiers

PMID21350585
PMCPMC3021193
OpenAlexW2026650388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.