ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Provision of acute stroke care and associated factors in a multiethnic population: prospective study with the South London Stroke Register.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing a complex rehabilitation intervention in a stroke trial: a qualitative process evaluation of AVERT.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Trial
- Long-Term Trends in Incidence and Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Stroke Subtypes Over 24 Years: The South London Stroke Register.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic Status and Stroke: A Review of the Latest Evidence on Inequalities and Their Drivers.Stroke · 2025Review
- World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: 2023 Update.Global heart · 2024Article
- Availability of stroke services and hospital facilities at different hospital levels in Thailand: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Trends in prevalence of acute stroke impairments: A population-based cohort study using the South London Stroke Register.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Long-term trends in death and dependence after ischaemic strokes: A retrospective cohort study using the South London Stroke Register (SLSR).PLoS medicine · 2020Observational
- Changes in survival and characteristics among older stroke unit patients-1994 versus 2012.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- A comparison of trends in stroke care and outcomes between in-hospital and community-onset stroke - The South London Stroke Register.PloS one · 2019Article
- Healthcare utilization and cost trajectories post-stroke: role of caregiver and stroke factors.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Long-term trends in incidence and risk factors for ischaemic stroke subtypes: Prospective population study of the South London Stroke Register.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in first stroke incidence, quality of care, and survival: a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 44 million adults in England.The Lancet. Public health · 2018Article
- Factors associated with late arrival of acute stroke patients to emergency department in Saudi Arabia.SAGE open medicine · 2018Article
- Health Inequalities Associated with Post-Stroke Visual Impairment in the United Kingdom and Ireland: A Systematic Review.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2017Review
- Increase in national intravenous thrombolysis rates for ischaemic stroke between 2005 and 2012: is bigger better?BMC neurology · 2016Article
- Temporal Changes in the Quality of Acute Stroke Care in Five National Audits across Europe.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- On decreasing inequality in health care in a cost-effective way.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Impact of implementing evidence-based acute stroke interventions on survival: the South London Stroke Register.PloS one · 2013Article
- Comparison of provision of stroke care in younger and older patients: findings from the South london stroke register.Stroke research and treatment · 2012Article
- Stroke in the very old: a systematic review of studies on incidence, outcome, and resource use.Journal of aging research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate time trends in receipt of effective acute stroke care and to determine the factors associated with provision of care.
designPopulation based stroke register.
settingSouth London.
participants3800 patients with first ever ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage registered between January 1995 and December 2009.
main outcome measuresAcute care interventions, admission to hospital, care on a stroke unit, acute drugs, and inequalities in access to care.
resultsBetween 2007 and 2009, 5% (33/620) of patients were still not admitted to a hospital after an acute stroke, particularly those with milder strokes, and 21% (124/584) of patients admitted to hospital were not admitted to a stroke unit. Rates of admission to stroke units and brain imaging, between 1995 and 2009, and for thrombolysis, between 2005 and 2009, increased significantly (P<0.001). Black patients compared with white patients had a significantly increased odds of admission to a stroke unit (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.29, P<0.001) and of receipt of occupational therapy or physiotherapy (1.90, 1.21 to 2.97, P=0.01), independent of age or stroke severity. Patients with motor or swallowing deficits were also more likely to be admitted to a stroke unit (1.52, 1.12 to 2.06, P=0.001 and 1.32, 1.02 to 1.72, P<0.001, respectively). Length of stay in hospital decreased significantly between 1995 and 2009 (P<0.001). The odds of brain imaging were lowest in patients aged 75 or more years (P=0.004) and those of lower socioeconomic status (P<0.001). The likelihood of those with a functional deficit receiving rehabilitation increased significantly over time (P<0.001). Patients aged 75 or more were more likely to receive occupational therapy or physiotherapy (P=0.002).
conclusionAlthough the receipt of effective acute stroke care improved between 1995 and 2009, inequalities in its provision were significant, and implementation of evidence based care was not optimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.