Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21349892›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

Provision of acute stroke care and associated factors in a multiethnic population: prospective study with the South London Stroke Register.

Juliet Addo, Ajay Bhalla, Siobhan Crichton, Anthony G Rudd, Christopher McKevitt, Charles D A Wolfe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliet AddoKing's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, London, UK. Juliet.addo@kcl.ac.uk
Ajay Bhalla
Siobhan Crichton
Anthony G Rudd
Christopher McKevitt
Charles D A Wolfe
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate time trends in receipt of effective acute stroke care and to determine the factors associated with provision of care.

designPopulation based stroke register.

settingSouth London.

participants3800 patients with first ever ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage registered between January 1995 and December 2009.

main outcome measuresAcute care interventions, admission to hospital, care on a stroke unit, acute drugs, and inequalities in access to care.

resultsBetween 2007 and 2009, 5% (33/620) of patients were still not admitted to a hospital after an acute stroke, particularly those with milder strokes, and 21% (124/584) of patients admitted to hospital were not admitted to a stroke unit. Rates of admission to stroke units and brain imaging, between 1995 and 2009, and for thrombolysis, between 2005 and 2009, increased significantly (P<0.001). Black patients compared with white patients had a significantly increased odds of admission to a stroke unit (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.29, P<0.001) and of receipt of occupational therapy or physiotherapy (1.90, 1.21 to 2.97, P=0.01), independent of age or stroke severity. Patients with motor or swallowing deficits were also more likely to be admitted to a stroke unit (1.52, 1.12 to 2.06, P=0.001 and 1.32, 1.02 to 1.72, P<0.001, respectively). Length of stay in hospital decreased significantly between 1995 and 2009 (P<0.001). The odds of brain imaging were lowest in patients aged 75 or more years (P=0.004) and those of lower socioeconomic status (P<0.001). The likelihood of those with a functional deficit receiving rehabilitation increased significantly over time (P<0.001). Patients aged 75 or more were more likely to receive occupational therapy or physiotherapy (P=0.002).

conclusionAlthough the receipt of effective acute stroke care improved between 1995 and 2009, inequalities in its provision were significant, and implementation of evidence based care was not optimal.

Indexed as

AgedBrain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHospital UnitsHumansLondonMaleProspective StudiesQuality of Health CareStroke

Identifiers

PMID21349892
PMCPMC3044771
OpenAlexW2066646050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.