Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21349698›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2011

Synapse-to-nucleus signaling.

Toh Hean Ch'ng, Kelsey C Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tracing synaptic loss in Alzheimer's brain with SV2A PET-tracer UCB-J.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-time imaging ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) Inactivation Increases Neuronal Network Activity by Enhancing CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Synaptic Framework for the Persistence of Memory Engrams.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toh Hean Ch'ngDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1737, United States.
Kelsey C Martin

Funding

Synapse to Nuclear Signaling During Long-Lasting Neuronal PlasticityR01MH077022 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARTIN, KELSEY C · 2007 to 2017
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077022NIMH NIH HHS R01MH077022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signals generated in distal subcellular compartments of neurons must often travel long distances to the nucleus to trigger changes in gene expression. This retrograde signaling is critical to the development, function, and survival of neural circuits, and neurons have evolved multiple mechanisms to transmit signals over long distances. In this review, we briefly summarize the range of mechanisms whereby distally generated signals are transported to neuronal nuclei. We then focus on the transport of soluble signals from the synapse to the nucleus during neuronal plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSignal TransductionSynapses

Identifiers

PMID21349698
PMCPMC3092794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.