Trial reportAtencion primaria2011
[Improvement of control in subjects with type 2 diabetes after a joint intervention: diabetes education and physical activity].
Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary program and physical activity impact on biochemical markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Atencion primaria · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention in Primary Care That Addresses Patients with Diabetes Mellitus with Two or More Unhealthy Habits, Such as Diet, Physical Activity or Smoking: Multicenter Randomized Cluster Trial (EIRA Study).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- [Evaluation of a supervised physical exercise program in sedentary patients over 65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus].Atencion primaria · 2015Trial
- Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Primary Care Socio-Ecological Approach to Improve Physical Activity Adherence among People with Type 2 Diabetes: The SENWI Project.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- [Exercise and type 2 diabetes mellitus].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Community clinical trial on type 2 diabetics: Benefits of health education associated with physical exercise].Atencion primaria · 2011Article
- Community Activities in Primary Care: A Literature Review.Journal of primary care & community healthReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the improvement of metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors, adherence, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (DM2) in a specific Health Care Area after group intervention through the community: diabetes education (DE) and physical exercise (PE).
designA single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.
interventiongroup 1: DE; group 2: ED and PE; group 3: only PE, and "control" group-4: Individual consultations. LOCATION: Urban health centre/municipal sports centre.
participants108 DM2, age: 40-70, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1)c) ≤ 8.5%, blood pressure (BP)<160/90 and body mass index (BMI)<45, excluding those with chronic complications and/or acute decompensation.
interventionsDuring 6 months, 8 workshops were held for group education and monitored aerobic physical exercise of moderate intensity (3 hours a week). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Primary variable pre- and post- intervention: reduction in HbA(1)c; other variables: examination and analytical data, therapeutic compliance, self-monitoring, self-care, attitudes and motivation (DAS-3SP survey).
resultsAfter intervention, more diabetics had a lower HbA(1)c following a full intervention: "DE" and "PE", RR: 1.93 (0.85-4.40) and exercise, RR: 1.56 (0.65-3.76). With simultaneous DE and PE, the BMI, RR: 1.61 (0.85-3.03) and LDL cholesterol, RR: 1.82 (0.99-3.36), of many subjects decreased. Dietary compliance, RR: 1.29 (0.32-5.22) and exercise, RR: 1.93 (0.76-4.91) also increased, more patients performing their own checks, RR: 3.86 (0.90-16.55) and improving motivation/attitudes in "strict control management", RR: 1.48 (0.94-2.34). With PE, systolic and diastolic BP decreased in more patients RR: 1.35 (0.72-2.52), 1.87 (0.72-4.84) while in the DE group only diastolic values decreased 1.80 (0.69-4.67).
conclusionsPatient conditions improve more with the combination of DE and PE, though the results are not statistically significant, probably due to insufficient sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.