Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21349088›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2011

Autophagy in immunity and cell-autonomous defense against intracellular microbes.

Vojo Deretic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Potential Effects of Indomethacin on Alleviating Osteoarthritis ProgressionJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vojo DereticDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. vderetic@salud.unm.edu

Funding

Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy in Mtb Control in AIDSR01AI042999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI DERETIC, VOJO P · 1998 to 2017
$6.6M
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Autophagy in Mtb Control in AIDSR37AI042999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI VOJO P DERETIC · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
Autophagy in TuberculosisR01AI069345 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI DERETIC, VOJO P · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Autophagy and Crohn's DiseaseRC1AI086845 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI DERETIC, VOJO P, MA, THOMAS Y · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI069345NIAID NIH HHS AI42999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069345NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI042999NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI086845NIAID NIH HHS RC1AI086845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy was viewed until very recently primarily as a metabolic and intracellular biomass and organelle quality and quantity control pathway. It has now been recognized that autophagy represents a bona fide immunologic process with a wide array of roles in immunity. The immunologic functions of autophagy, as we understand them now, span both innate and adaptive immunity. They range from unique and sometimes highly specialized immunologic effectors and regulatory functions (referred to here as type I immunophagy) to generic homeostatic influence on immune cells (type II immunophagy), akin to the effects on survival and homeostasis of other cell types in the body. As a concept-building tool for understanding why and how autophagy is intertwined with immunity, it is useful to consider that the presently complex picture has emerged in increments, starting in part from the realization that autophagy acts as an evolutionarily ancient microbial clearance mechanism defending eukaryotic cells against intracellular pathogens. In this review, we build a stepwise model of how the core axis of autophagy as a cell-autonomous immune defense against microbes evolved into a complex but orderly web of intersections with innate and adaptive immunity processes. The connections between autophagy and conventional immunity systems include Toll-like receptors, Nod-like receptors, RIG-I-like receptors, damage-associated molecular patterns such as HMGB1, other known innate and adaptive immunity receptors and cytokines, sequestasome (p62)-like receptors that act as autophagy adapters, immunity-related GTPase IRGM, innate and adaptive functions of macrophages and dendritic cells, and differential effects on development and homeostasis of T- and B-lymphocyte subsets. The disease contexts covered here include tuberculosis, infections with human immunodeficiency virus and other viruses, Salmonella, Listeria, Shigella, Toxoplasma, and inflammatory disorders such as Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunity, InnateAnimalsAutophagyCommunicable DiseasesHumansIntracellular SpaceSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID21349088
PMCPMC3057454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.