ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2011
Prediction tacrolimus blood levels based on the Bayesian method in adult kidney transplant patients.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Models to Optimize Tacrolimus Dosing in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Smartphone-measured tremor and tacrolimus trough levels in kidney transplant recipients: an exploratory prospective study.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Article
- Improved prediction of tacrolimus concentrations early after kidney transplantation using theory-based pharmacokinetic modelling.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Dosing equation for tacrolimus using genetic variants and clinical factors.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of tacrolimus is complicated by its narrow therapeutic index and wide intra- and interpatient variability. We have previously described a tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics model obtained in an adult kidney transplant cohort. The aims of the present study were (1) to validate that model using an external dataset and (2) to evaluate the prediction using a Bayesian method. Data were retrospectively collected from 34 adult patients receiving kidney transplantation. Trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus were predicted using the empirical Bayesian method with sparse samples obtained during the previous week. The system performance was evaluated by the mean prediction error (ME), mean absolute prediction error (MAE). and root mean square error (RMSE). Patients were administrated oral or intravenous tacrolimus as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Subsequent doses were adjusted on the basis of clinical evidence of efficacy and toxicity and by routine therapeutic drug monitoring. In our previous model, clearance increased with post transplantation days and with prednisone dosage. Concentrations predicted by the population mean pharmacokinetic parameter values match well with observed concentrations during oral therapy. Bayesian prediction using trough concentrations obtained after 21 days of treatment significantly decreased ME, MAE, and RMSE compared with predictions from data including this period. After 21 days of treatment, there was an insignificant bias ME (0.22 ± 2.59 ng/ml), a reasonable precision MAE (1.97 ± 1.69 ng/ml) and RMSE (1.28 ± 0.58 ng/ml). The present study demonstrates the suitability of the Bayesian method for the prediction of trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus using only few samples in adult kidney transplantation recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21347736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.