Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347642›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2011

Stimulant effects of adenosine antagonists on operant behavior: differential actions of selective A2A and A1 antagonists.

Patrick A Randall, Eric J Nunes, Simone L Janniere, Colin M Stopper, Andrew M Farrar, Thomas N Sager, Younis Baqi, Jörg Hockemeyer, Christa E Müller, John D Salamone

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adenosine APsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Vigor, Effort-Related Aspects of Motivation and Anhedonia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Altered Heterosynaptic Plasticity Impairs Visual Discrimination Learning in Adenosine A1 Receptor Knock-Out Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pharmacological Blockade of Adenosine AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick A RandallDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA.
Eric J Nunes
Simone L Janniere
Colin M Stopper
Andrew M Farrar
Thomas N Sager
Younis Baqi
Jörg Hockemeyer
Christa E Müller
John D Salamone
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Bonn · DELundbeck (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Effort-related Functions of Nucleus Accumbens Adenosine A2A ReceptorsR01MH078023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SALAMONE, JOHN D · 2007 to 2010
$835k
NIMH NIH HHS MH078023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAdenosine A(2A) antagonists can reverse many of the behavioral effects of dopamine antagonists, including actions on instrumental behavior. However, little is known about the effects of selective adenosine antagonists on operant behavior when these drugs are administered alone.

objectiveThe present studies were undertaken to investigate the potential for rate-dependent stimulant effects of both selective and nonselective adenosine antagonists.

methodsSix drugs were tested: two nonselective adenosine antagonists (caffeine and theophylline), two adenosine A(1) antagonists (DPCPX and CPT), and two adenosine A(2A) antagonists (istradefylline (KW6002) and MSX-3). Two schedules of reinforcement were employed; a fixed interval 240-s (FI-240 sec) schedule was used to generate low baseline rates of responding and a fixed ratio 20 (FR20) schedule generated high rates.

resultsCaffeine and theophylline produced rate-dependent effects on lever pressing, increasing responding on the FI-240 sec schedule but decreasing responding on the FR20 schedule. The A(2A) antagonists MSX-3 and istradefylline increased FI-240 sec lever pressing but did not suppress FR20 lever pressing in the dose range tested. In fact, there was a tendency for istradefylline to increase FR20 responding at a moderate dose. A(1) antagonists failed to increase lever pressing rate, but DPCPX decreased FR20 responding at higher doses.

conclusionsThese results suggest that adenosine A(2A) antagonists enhance operant response rates, but A(1) antagonists do not. The involvement of adenosine A(2A) receptors in regulating aspects of instrumental response output and behavioral activation may have implications for the treatment of effort-related psychiatric dysfunctions, such as psychomotor slowing and anergia in depression.

Indexed as

Adenosine A1 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugMalePurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleAdenosine A1 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsPurinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID21347642
PMCPMC3522121
OpenAlexW2019770388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.