ReviewThe AAPS journal2011
A rational, systematic approach for the development of vaccine formulations.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicochemical properties and adsorption state of aluminum adjuvants with different processes in vaccines.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Review
- Fluorine-Functionalized Polyphosphazene Immunoadjuvant: Synthesis, Solution Behavior and In Vivo Potency.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Engineering the hydroxyl content on aluminum oxyhydroxide nanorod for elucidating the antigen adsorption behavior.NPJ vaccines · 2022Article
- Potentiating pneumococcal glycoconjugate vaccine PCV13 with saponin adjuvant VSA-1.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Characterization and stabilization in process development and product formulation for super large proteinaceous particles.Engineering in life sciences · 2020Review
- The COVID-19 Vaccine Race: Challenges and Opportunities in Vaccine Formulation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2020Review
- Article
- High Throughput Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF) Formulation Screening with Complementary Dyes to Assess Protein Unfolding and Aggregation in Presence of Surfactants.Pharmaceutical research · 2018Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the Potency, Neutralizing Antibody Response, and Stability of a Recombinant Fusion Protein Vaccine for Streptococcus pyogenes.The AAPS journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous emergence of new infectious diseases and new strains of current diseases, such as the novel H1N1 influenza in 2009, in combination with expanding competition in the vaccine marketplace, the pressure to develop vaccine formulations right the first time is increasing. As vaccines are complex, costly, and have high risk associated with their development, it is necessary to maximize the potential for development of a successful formulation quickly. To accomplish this goal, the historical empirical approach to formulation development needs to be updated with a rational, systematic approach allowing for more rapid development of safe, efficacious, and stable vaccine formulations. The main components to this approach are biophysical characterization of the antigen, evaluation of stabilizers, investigation of antigen interactions with adjuvants, evaluation of product contact materials, and monitoring stability both in real time and under accelerated conditions. An overview of investigations performed for each of these components of formulation development is discussed. The information gained in these studies is valuable in forming the base of knowledge for the design of a robust formulation. With the use of continually advancing technology in combination with maintaining a rational, systematic approach to formulation development, there is a great increase in the probability of successfully developing a safe, effective, and stable vaccine formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.