Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347348›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2011

Genetic mapping identifies novel highly protective antigens for an apicomplexan parasite.

Damer P Blake, Karen J Billington, Susan L Copestake, Richard D Oakes, Michael A Quail, Kiew-Lian Wan, Martin W Shirley, Adrian L Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic diversity inVeterinary world · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunoinformatics-Aided Design of a Multiepitope Vaccine AgainstBioinformatics and biology insights · 2025
    Article
  8. Study of dense granule proteins inFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of Avian coccidiosis in India: a review.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Review
  12. RNA-Seq of Phenotypically DistinctPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Determination of B and T Cell Epitopes inBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. PLGA Nanospheres as Delivery Platforms forFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Damer P BlakeInstitute for Animal Health, Compton, Berkshire, United Kingdom. dblake@rvc.ac.uk
Karen J Billington
Susan L Copestake
Richard D Oakes
Michael A Quail
Kiew-Lian Wan
Martin W Shirley
Adrian L Smith
The Pirbright Institute · GBMalaysia Genome Institute · MYUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01089X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBE01089X1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S20198Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 085775/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apicomplexan parasites are responsible for a myriad of diseases in humans and livestock; yet despite intensive effort, development of effective sub-unit vaccines remains a long-term goal. Antigenic complexity and our inability to identify protective antigens from the pool that induce response are serious challenges in the development of new vaccines. Using a combination of parasite genetics and selective barriers with population-based genetic fingerprinting, we have identified that immunity against the most important apicomplexan parasite of livestock (Eimeria spp.) was targeted against a few discrete regions of the genome. Herein we report the identification of six genomic regions and, within two of those loci, the identification of true protective antigens that confer immunity as sub-unit vaccines. The first of these is an Eimeria maxima homologue of apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) and the second is a previously uncharacterised gene that we have termed 'immune mapped protein-1' (IMP-1). Significantly, homologues of the AMA-1 antigen are protective with a range of apicomplexan parasites including Plasmodium spp., which suggest that there may be some characteristic(s) of protective antigens shared across this diverse group of parasites. Interestingly, homologues of the IMP-1 antigen, which is protective against E. maxima infection, can be identified in Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum. Overall, this study documents the discovery of novel protective antigens using a population-based genetic mapping approach allied with a protection-based screen of candidate genes. The identification of AMA-1 and IMP-1 represents a substantial step towards development of an effective anti-eimerian sub-unit vaccine and raises the possibility of identification of novel antigens for other apicomplexan parasites. Moreover, validation of the parasite genetics approach to identify effective antigens supports its adoption in other parasite systems where legitimate protective antigen identification is difficult.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingAlgorithmsAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanApicomplexaChickensCytoprotectionFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsImmune EvasionImmunizationModels, BiologicalParasitesPoultry DiseasesAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID21347348
PMCPMC3037358
OpenAlexW2056330722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.