Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347318›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

A hybrid model of mammalian cell cycle regulation.

Rajat Singhania, R Michael Sramkoski, James W Jacobberger, John J Tyson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A hybrid stochastic model of the budding yeast cell cycle.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Coordinated histone modifications and chromatin reorganization in a single cell revealed by FRET biosensors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. A blueprint for human whole-cell modeling.Current opinion in systems biology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajat SinghaniaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
R Michael Sramkoski
James W Jacobberger
John J Tyson
Case Western Reserve University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
Tumor Cell Networks CenterU54CA112967 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LAUFFENBURGER, DOUGLAS A · 2004 to 2015
$26.2M
STANDARDIZED MULTIPARAMETRIC CELL CYCLE ANALYSISR01CA073413 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBBERGER, JAMES W · 1996 to 2008
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS P30-CA43703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA073413NCI NIH HHS R01-CA73413NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112967NCI NIH HHS U54-CA112967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing of DNA synthesis, mitosis and cell division is regulated by a complex network of biochemical reactions that control the activities of a family of cyclin-dependent kinases. The temporal dynamics of this reaction network is typically modeled by nonlinear differential equations describing the rates of the component reactions. This approach provides exquisite details about molecular regulatory processes but is hampered by the need to estimate realistic values for the many kinetic constants that determine the reaction rates. It is difficult to estimate these kinetic constants from available experimental data. To avoid this problem, modelers often resort to 'qualitative' modeling strategies, such as Boolean switching networks, but these models describe only the coarsest features of cell cycle regulation. In this paper we describe a hybrid approach that combines the best features of continuous differential equations and discrete Boolean networks. Cyclin abundances are tracked by piecewise linear differential equations for cyclin synthesis and degradation. Cyclin synthesis is regulated by transcription factors whose activities are represented by discrete variables (0 or 1) and likewise for the activities of the ubiquitin-ligating enzyme complexes that govern cyclin degradation. The discrete variables change according to a predetermined sequence, with the times between transitions determined in part by cyclin accumulation and degradation and as well by exponentially distributed random variables. The model is evaluated in terms of flow cytometry measurements of cyclin proteins in asynchronous populations of human cell lines. The few kinetic constants in the model are easily estimated from the experimental data. Using this hybrid approach, modelers can quickly create quantitatively accurate, computational models of protein regulatory networks in cells.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell CycleCell LineCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyContact InhibitionCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsDNAEndothelial CellsFlow CytometryHumansMathematical ConceptsCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsDNA

Identifiers

PMID21347318
PMCPMC3037389
OpenAlexW2049982841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.