Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347266›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Comparative functional genomics of salt stress in related model and cultivated plants identifies and overcomes limitations to translational genomics.

Diego H Sanchez, Fernando L Pieckenstain, Jedrzey Szymanski, Alexander Erban, Mariusz Bromke, Matthew A Hannah, Ute Kraemer, Joachim Kopka, Michael K Udvardi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A CaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genes · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. DistinctFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diego H SanchezMax Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Fernando L Pieckenstain
Jedrzey Szymanski
Alexander Erban
Mariusz Bromke
Matthew A Hannah
Ute Kraemer
Joachim Kopka
Michael K Udvardi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the objectives of plant translational genomics is to use knowledge and genes discovered in model species to improve crops. However, the value of translational genomics to plant breeding, especially for complex traits like abiotic stress tolerance, remains uncertain. Using comparative genomics (ionomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics) we analyzed the responses to salinity of three model and three cultivated species of the legume genus Lotus. At physiological and ionomic levels, models responded to salinity in a similar way to crop species, and changes in the concentration of shoot Cl(-) correlated well with tolerance. Metabolic changes were partially conserved, but divergence was observed amongst the genotypes. Transcriptome analysis showed that about 60% of expressed genes were responsive to salt treatment in one or more species, but less than 1% was responsive in all. Therefore, genotype-specific transcriptional and metabolic changes overshadowed conserved responses to salinity and represent an impediment to simple translational genomics. However, 'triangulation' from multiple genotypes enabled the identification of conserved and tolerant-specific responses that may provide durable tolerance across species.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsLotusPhenotypeSalinitySaltsSalt ToleranceStress, PhysiologicalSalts

Identifiers

PMID21347266
PMCPMC3038935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.