ArticleSummit on translational bioinformatics2009
Consistent visualizations of changing knowledge.
Article in Summit on translational bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mining the pharmacogenomics literature--a survey of the state of the art.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Networks are increasingly used in biology to represent complex data in uncomplicated symbolic form. However, as biological knowledge is continually evolving, so must those networks representing this knowledge. Capturing and presenting this type of knowledge change over time is particularly challenging due to the intimate manner in which researchers customize those networks they come into contact with. The effective visualization of this knowledge is important as it creates insight into complex systems and stimulates hypothesis generation and biological discovery. Here we highlight how the retention of user customizations, and the collection and visualization of knowledge associated provenance supports effective and productive network exploration. We also present an extension of the Hanalyzer system, ReOrient, which supports network exploration and analysis in the presence of knowledge change.
Identifiers
21347184PMC3041575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.