ArticleSummit on translational bioinformatics2010
Evaluation of an Ontology-anchored Natural Language-based Approach for Asserting Multi-scale Biomolecular Networks for Systems Medicine.
Article in Summit on translational bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to adequately and efficiently integrate unstructured, heterogeneous datasets, which are incumbent to systems biology and medicine, is one of the primary limitations to their comprehensive analysis. Natural language processing (NLP) and biomedical ontologies are automated methods for capturing, standardizing and integrating information across diverse sources, including narrative text. We have utilized the BioMedLEE NLP system to extract and encode, using standard ontologies (e.g., Cell Type Ontology, Mammalian Phenotype, Gene Ontology), biomolecular mechanisms and clinical phenotypes from the scientific literature. We subsequently applied semantic processing techniques to the structured BioMedLEE output to determine the relationships between these biomolecular and clinical phenotype concepts. We conducted an evaluation that shows an average precision and recall of BioMedLEE with respect to annotating phrases comprised of cell type, anatomy/disease, and gene/protein concepts were 86% and 78%, respectively. The precision of the asserted phenotype-molecular relationships was 75%.
Identifiers
21347135PMC3041541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.