ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010
Integrating heterogeneous knowledge sources to acquire executable drug-related knowledge.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating NLP Approaches to Extract Drug Indications.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Concept Relations Improve Detection of Off-Label Drug Use in Electronic Health Records Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023Article
- Developing a Data-driven Medication Indication Knowledge Base using a Large Scale Medical Claims Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- Evaluation of a Novel System to Enhance Clinicians' Recognition of Preadmission Adverse Drug Reactions.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- A pipeline to extract drug-adverse event pairs from multiple data sources.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014Article
- Lessons learned from developing a drug evidence base to support pharmacovigilance.Applied clinical informatics · 2013Article
- Mining the pharmacogenomics literature--a survey of the state of the art.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Automatic identification and normalization of dosage forms in drug monographs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Article
- A context-blocks model for identifying clinical relationships in patient records.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Determining the reasons for medication prescriptions in the EHR using knowledge and natural language processing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge of medical entities, such as drug-related information is critical for many automated biomedical applications, such as decision support and pharmacovigilance. In this work, heterogeneous information sources were integrated automatically to obtain drug-related knowledge. We focus on one type of knowledge, drug-treats-condition, in the study and propose a framework for integrating disparate knowledge sources. Evaluation based on a random sample of drug-condition pairs indicated an overall coverage of 96%, recall of 98% and a precision of 87%. In conclusion, the preliminary study demonstrated that the knowledge generated from this study was comparable to the manually curated gold standard and that this method of automatically integrating knowledge sources is effective. The automated method should also be applicable to integrate other clinical knowledge, such as drug-related knowledge with omics information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21347099PMC3041361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.