Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347095›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010

Representing Patient Assessments in LOINC®.

Daniel J Vreeman, Clement J McDonald, Stanley M Huff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Semantic interoperability of Health Risk Assessments.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011
    Article
  7. LOINC® - A Universal Catalog of Individual Clinical Observations and Uniform Representation of Enumerated Collections.International journal of functional informatics and personalised medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel J VreemanRegenstrief Institute, Inc and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;
Clement J McDonald
Stanley M Huff

Funding

NLM's Personal Health Record and Consumer Service R&DZIALM008925 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2020
$11.8M
NLM NIH HHS HHSN276200800006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Without being included in accepted vocabulary standards, the results of completed patient assessment instruments cannot be easily shared in health information exchanges. To address this important barrier, we have developed a robust model to represent assessments in LOINC through iterative refinement and collaborative development. To capture the essential aspects of the assessment, the LOINC model represents the hierarchical panel structure, global item attributes, panel-specific item attributes, and structured answer lists. All assessments are available in a uniform format within the freely available LOINC distribution. We have successfully added many assessments to LOINC in this model, including several federally required assessments that contain functioning and disability content. We continue adding to this "master question file" to further enable interoperable exchange, storage, and processing of assessment data.

Indexed as

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and CodesVocabulary, ControlledClinical Laboratory Information SystemsHealth Information ExchangeHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID21347095
PMCPMC3041404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.