Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347043›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010

Semantic Similarity and Relatedness between Clinical Terms: An Experimental Study.

Serguei Pakhomov, Bridget McInnes, Terrence Adam, Ying Liu, Ted Pedersen, Genevieve B Melton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving medical term embeddings using UMLS Metathesaurus.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Serguei PakhomovCollege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Bridget McInnes
Terrence Adam
Ying Liu
Ted Pedersen
Genevieve B Melton

Funding

Sematic Relatedness for Active Medication Safety and Outcomes SurveillanceR01LM009623 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2008 to 2010
$949k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated approaches to measuring semantic similarity and relatedness can provide necessary semantic context information for information retrieval applications and a number of fundamental natural language processing tasks including word sense disambiguation. Challenges for the development of these approaches include the limited availability of validated reference standards and the need for better understanding of the notions of semantic relatedness and similarity in medical vocabulary. We present results of a study in which eight medical residents were asked to judge 724 pairs of medical terms for semantic similarity and relatedness. The results of the study confirm the existence of a measurable mental representation of semantic relatedness between medical terms that is distinct from similarity and independent of the context in which the terms occur. This study produced a validated publicly available dataset for developing automated approaches to measuring semantic relatedness and similarity.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSemanticsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID21347043
PMCPMC3041430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.