Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21347034›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010

Looking for Anemia (and Other Disorders) in SNOMED CT: Comparison of Three Approaches and Practical Implications.

Fleur Mougin, Olivier Bodenreider, Anita Burgun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. SNOMED CT's RF2: Is the future bright?Studies in health technology and informatics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fleur MouginLESIM, INSERM U897, ISPED, University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, France.
Olivier Bodenreider
Anita Burgun

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health professionals are faced with challenges when they have to exploit the semantics of concepts present in clinical terminologies in support of research activities. The difficulty lies in the fact that this semantics is represented not only through the labels of concepts, but also their position in the hierarchy, and, when available, their logical and textual definitions. We investigate and contrast the lexical, hierarchical, and logical representations of concepts in SNOMED CT through the example of Anemia and three other disorders. The four use cases we developed suggest that the lexical, hierarchical, and logical representations of concepts have a limited degree of overlap, but are complementary. Finally, we draw practical implications from our findings for SNOMED CT users and developers.

Indexed as

SemanticsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineAnemiaHumansVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID21347034
PMCPMC3041405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.