ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010
A large-scale knowledge management method based on the analysis of the use of online knowledge resources.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Optimization of infobutton design and Implementation: A systematic review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- Knowledge Management Implementation and the Tools Utilized in Healthcare for Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Systematic Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Information needs of generalists and specialists using online best-practice algorithms to answer clinical questions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledOnline health knowledge resources can be integrated into electronic health record systems using decision support tools known as "infobuttons." In this study we describe a knowledge management method based on the analysis of knowledge resource use via infobuttons in multiple institutions.
methodsWe conducted a two-phase analysis of laboratory test infobutton sessions at three healthcare institutions accessing two knowledge resources. The primary study measure was session coverage, i.e. the rate of infobutton sessions in which resources retrieved relevant content.
resultsIn Phase One, resources covered 78.5% of the study sessions. In addition, a subset of 38 noncovered tests that most frequently raised questions was identified. In Phase Two, content development guided by the outcomes of Phase One resulted in a 4% average coverage increase.
conclusionThe described method is a valuable approach to large-scale knowledge management in rapidly changing domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21346957PMC3041436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.