Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21346946›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010

Peers, regulators, and professions: the influence of organizations in health information technology adoption.

Thomas R Campion, Cynthia S Gadd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas R CampionDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Implementation Sciences Laboratory Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville TN.
Cynthia S Gadd

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the U.S. National Research Council, current health information technology (HIT) efforts are insufficient and arguably detrimental to healthcare transformation. Many hospitals have already implemented HIT, and federal stimulus funding will further adoption efforts. Organizations become more similar through the adoption of innovations like HIT, but the effects of the changes do not necessarily improve efficiency. This view from sociology and organizational studies, called institutional isomorphism, suggests that organizations pursue changes endorsed by peers, regulators, and professional societies through mimetic, coercive, and normative mechanisms, respectively, that improve legitimacy, a socially constructed value that determines an organization's ability to obtain resources and survive. In this paper we examine mimetic, coercive, and normative influences in the adoption of three HIT innovations as well as evidence of resulting inefficiency. Institutional isomorphism provides a useful framework for researchers and practitioners to examine variation in HIT adoption.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMedical InformaticsHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21346946
PMCPMC3041341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.