Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21346941›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2010

Evaluation of the CCAM Hierarchy and Semi Structured Code for Retrieving Relevant Procedures in a Hospital Case Mix Database.

Cédric Bousquet, Béatrice Trombert, Julien Souvignet, Eric Sadou, Jean-Marie Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Strabismus outcomes after surgery: the nationwide SOS France study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cédric BousquetDepartment of Public Health and Medical Informatics, CHU Université Jean-Monnet, Saint Etienne, France;
Béatrice Trombert
Julien Souvignet
Eric Sadou
Jean-Marie Rodrigues

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In France, clinical procedures are coded with the French procedures classification (Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux, CCAM) and recorded in every hospital. CCAM uses hierarchical semi-structured codes which describe procedures (topography, action, access mode and/or technique). This amount of information could be analyzed and used for clinical and medico-economic evaluation. But relevant and practical data searches are difficult. In this paper we present a use case about searching for endoscopic activities in a case mix database to evaluate the relevance of the hierarchical organization and semi structured codes of CCAM in order to retrieve data already coded using this controlled vocabulary. Precision was 0.79 and recall 0.84 in the hierarchical search whereas precision was 0.94 and recall was 0.81 using part of the code related to access mode and/or technique. We discuss a revision of the CCAM by the use of an existing modeling (from the GALEN project) and better knowledge representation for each procedure.

Indexed as

HospitalsVocabulary, ControlledDiagnosis-Related GroupsFranceHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21346941
PMCPMC3041456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.