Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21346207›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurophysiology2011

Human primary visual cortex (V1) is selective for second-order spatial frequency.

Luke E Hallum, Michael S Landy, David J Heeger

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Visual P2p component responds to perceived numerosity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Resolving the Spatial Profile of Figure Enhancement in Human V1 through Population Receptive Field Modeling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phase-Dependent Interactions in Visual Cortex to Combinations of First- and Second-Order Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke E HallumDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. hallum@cns.nyu.edu
Michael S Landy
David J Heeger

Funding

Visual Perception and Coding of TextureR01EY016165 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LANDY, MICHAEL S · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY-016165NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of cues can differentiate objects from their surrounds. These include "first-order" cues such as luminance modulations and "second-order" cues involving modulations of orientation and contrast. Human sensitivity to first-order modulations is well described by a computational model involving spatially localized filters that are selective for orientation and spatial frequency (SF). It is widely held that first-order modulations are represented by the firing rates of simple and complex cells ("first-order" neurons) in primary visual cortex (V1) that, likewise, have spatially localized receptive fields that are selective for orientation- and SF. Human sensitivity to second-order modulations is well described by a filter-rectify-filter (FRF) model, with first- and second-order filters selective for orientation and SF. However, little is known about how neuronal activity in visual cortex represents second-order modulations. We tested the FRF model by using an functional (f)MRI-adaptation protocol to characterize the selectivity of activity in visual cortex to second-order, orientation-defined gratings of two different SFs. fMRI responses throughout early visual cortex exhibited selective adaptation to these stimuli. The low-SF grating was a more effective adapter than the high-SF grating, incompatible with the FRF model. To explain the results, we extended the FRF model by incorporating normalization, yielding a filter-rectify-normalize-filter model, in which normalization enhances selectivity for second-order SF but only for low spatial frequencies. We conclude that neurons in human visual cortex are selective for second-order SF, that normalization (surround suppression) contributes to this selectivity, and that the selectivity in higher visual areas is simply fed forward from V1.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAdultHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedOrientationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSpace PerceptionVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21346207
PMCPMC3094179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.