Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21346037›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2011

Beyond traditional outcomes: improving quality of life in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

David Cella

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Phase III Randomized IMmotion151 Trial: AtezolizumabClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the UK: insights from the RECCORD registry.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and initial validation of the NCCN/FACT symptom index for advanced kidney cancer.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David CellaRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. d-cella@northwestern.edu
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of molecular targeted therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has provided treatment options that are more efficacious and better tolerated than cytokine therapy, the previous standard of care. These advances have led to renewed efforts to define the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impact of disease status stabilization or improvement versus that of treatment-associated adverse events. The distinct classes of targeted agents have unique AE profiles related to their specific targets; therefore, treatment considerations should include the patient's pretreatment HRQOL along with the known HRQOL effects of each drug. With more second- and third-line treatment options available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, HRQOL outcomes in earlier lines of therapy may guide treatment decisions for subsequent therapy, as poor HRQOL at therapy onset predicts poor survival. Both general and disease-specific instruments are used in clinical trials to reveal the impact of treatment on patient-reported outcomes. In this article, the common instruments used to assess HRQOL and the HRQOL outcomes observed in pivotal trials of targeted therapies are reviewed. Current data indicate that first-line therapy with sunitinib and first-line therapy in poor-prognosis patients with temsirolimus provide improved HRQOL compared with interferon-α. First- and second-line therapy with pazopanib and second-line therapy with everolimus and sorafenib maintained HRQOL levels similar to placebo, indicating that these agents do not worsen HRQOL. The HRQOL effects of bevacizumab plus IFN-α have not been reported. As new agents enter clinical investigation, HRQOL data can help determine their overall role in treatment.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzenesulfonatesBevacizumabCarcinoma, Renal CellClinical Trials as TopicEverolimusHumansIndolesInterferon-alphaKidney NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzenesulfonatesBevacizumabEverolimusIndolesInterferon-alphaNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesPyrrolesSirolimusSorafenibSunitinibtemsirolimus

Identifiers

PMID21346037
PMCPMC3868200
OpenAlexW2155824113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.