Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21345987›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2011

Use of an adult rat retinal explant model for screening of potential retinal ganglion cell neuroprotective therapies.

Natalie D Bull, Thomas V Johnson, Guncha Welsapar, Nicholas W DeKorver, Stanislav I Tomarev, Keith R Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptomic Analysis of Organotypic Porcine Retina Cultures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanomedicine in Ophthalmology: From Bench to Bedside.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. NMOSD IgG Impact Retinal Cells in Murine Retinal Explants.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Optic Nerve Engraftment of Neural Stem Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie D BullCambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Thomas V Johnson
Guncha Welsapar
Nicholas W DeKorver
Stanislav I Tomarev
Keith R Martin
National Institutes of Health · USNational Eye Institute · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
Medical Research Council G0800784NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE. To validate an established adult organotypic retinal explant culture system for use as an efficient medium-throughput screening tool to investigate novel retinal ganglion cell (RGC) neuroprotective therapies. METHODS. Optimal culture conditions for detecting RGC neuroprotection in rat retinal explants were identified. Retinal explants were treated with various recognized, or purported, neuroprotective agents and cultured for either 4 or 7 days ex vivo. The number of cells surviving in the RGC layer (RGCL) was quantified using histologic and immunohistochemical techniques, and statistical analyses were applied to detect neuroprotective effects. RESULTS. The ability to replicate previously reported in vivo RGC neuroprotection in retinal explants was verified by demonstrating that caspase inhibition, brain-derived neurotrophic factor treatment, and stem cell transplantation all reduced RGCL cell loss in this model. Further screening of potential neuroprotective pharmacologic agents demonstrated that betaxolol, losartan, tafluprost, and simvastatin all alleviated RGCL cell loss in retinal explants, supporting previous reports. However, treatment with brimonidine did not protect RGCL neurons from death in retinal explant cultures. Explants cultured for 4 days ex vivo proved most sensitive for detecting neuroprotection. CONCLUSIONS. The current adult rat retinal explant culture model offers advantages over other models for screening potential neuroprotective drugs, including maintenance of neurons in situ, control of environmental conditions, and dissociation from other factors such as intraocular pressure. Verification that neuroprotection by previously identified RGC-protective therapies could be replicated in adult retinal explant cultures suggests that this model could be used for efficient medium-throughput screening of novel neuroprotective therapies for retinal neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAmino Acid Chloromethyl KetonesAnimalsApoptosisBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCaspase InhibitorsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesColforsinDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsNerve CrushNeuroprotective AgentsOcular HypertensionAmino Acid Chloromethyl Ketonesbenzyloxycarbonylvalyl-alanyl-aspartyl fluoromethyl ketoneBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCaspase InhibitorsColforsinNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID21345987
PMCPMC3109030
OpenAlexW2054859767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.