Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21345665›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2011

Locking the genome: nuclear organization and cell fate.

Peter Meister, Susan E Mango, Susan M Gasser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Epigenetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Editorial: In celebration of women in developmental epigenetics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perspectives: using polymer modeling to understand the formation and function of nuclear compartments.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter MeisterFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Maulbeerstrasse 66, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Susan E Mango
Susan M Gasser

Funding

ORGANOGENESIS OF THE PHARYNX IN C ELEGANSR01GM056264 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MANGO, SUSAN E · 1998 to 2010
$3.3M
Organogenesis of the Pharynx in C ElegansR37GM056264 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MANGO, SUSAN E · 2011 to 2018
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056264NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM056264NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM056264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differentiation of pluripotent or totipotent cells into various differentiated cell types is accompanied by a restriction of gene expression patterns, alteration in histone and DNA methylation, and changes in the gross nuclear organization of eu- and heterochromatic domains. Several recent studies have coupled genome-wide mapping of histone modifications with changes in gene expression. Other studies have examined changes in the subnuclear positioning of tissue-specific genes upon transcriptional induction or repression. Here we summarize intriguing correlations of the three phenomena, which suggest that in some cases causal relationships may exist.

Indexed as

Cell LineageGenomeAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell NucleusEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic MarkersHumansGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21345665
PMCPMC4041333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.