ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2011
Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation.
Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The epigenetic landscape: An evolving concept.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2023Article
- Sex bias in systemic lupus erythematosus: a molecular insight.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2022Review
- Activation of Xist by an evolutionarily conserved function of KDM5C demethylase.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Abnormal X chromosome inactivation and tumor development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- DMD carrier model with mosaic dystrophin expression in the heart reveals complex vulnerability to myocardial injury.Human molecular genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome.BMC genomics · 2018Review
- Deciphering the Role of the Barr Body in Malignancy: An insight into head and neck cancer.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2017Review
- Differentiation-dependent requirement of Tsix long non-coding RNA in imprinted X-chromosome inactivation.Nature communications · 2014Article
- RNA Splicing Factors and RNA-Directed DNA Methylation.Biology · 2014Article
- Sex-biased chromatin and regulatory cross-talk between sex chromosomes, autosomes, and mitochondria.Biology of sex differences · 2014Article
- Autoimmune diseases and polyamines.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012Review
- Unraveling the glioma epigenome: from molecular mechanisms to novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2011Review
- Epigenetics in nucleotide repeat expansion disorders.Seminars in neurology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation is a paradigmatic epigenetic phenomenon that results in the mitotically heritable transcriptional inactivation of one X-chromosome in female mammals, thereby equalizing X-linked gene dosage between the sexes. The epigenetic factors and mechanisms that execute X-inactivation overlap with those that regulate embryonic development and disease progression, thus offering a window into the epigenetic processes that regulate development and disease. Here I summarize some recent developments as well as open questions in X-inactivation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.