ArticleHerz2011
Multiple left ventricular inferoseptal clefts. Multimodality imaging appearance and differential diagnosis.
Article in Herz, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significance of left ventricular clefts-A case report.Journal of cardiology cases · 2014Article
- Myocardial Cleft in a Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome Assessed by Multimodal Imaging.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular inferoseptal clefts are a localized variant of myocardial structure, easily overlooked but potentially raising concern when identified through imaging. CASE STUDY: Here we illustrate and describe inferoseptal clefts by means of multimodality imaging and consider them in relation to possible differential diagnoses. A 49-year-old male patient was investigated for chest pain and found to have multiple inferoseptal clefts. The pain subsequently resolved and was thought to have been pleuritic. There was no evidence or family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The diagnosis of clefts was arrived at after consultation with several cardiac imaging specialists and the few available relevant published reports. Echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, invasive ventriculography and computed tomography each showed the clefts in relation to surrounding compact and contractile myocardium of the inferoseptal region, which occluded the clefts in systole. In terms of location, orientation and systolic occlusion the inferoseptal clefts resembled the isolated clefts reported in healthy volunteers, and have features in common with crypts reported in carriers of a genetic mutation associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The incidence and implications of multiple inferoseptal clefts have yet to be determined.
conclusionMultimodality imaging permits clear depiction of left ventricular inferoseptal clefts, which should be distinguished from different entities such as left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC), cardiac diverticula and cardiac aneurysms. Inferoseptal clefts have yet to be widely recognized as a distinct variant of regional left ventricular structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.