Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21344039›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA

Bacterial/archaeal/organellar polyadenylation.

Bijoy K Mohanty, Sidney R Kushner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhanced Prodigiosin Production inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Acquisition ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The multitasking polyA tail: nuclear RNA maturation, degradation and export.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bijoy K MohantyDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Sidney R Kushner
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Analysis of E. coli ribonucleases and RNA metabolismR01GM081554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KUSHNER, SIDNEY R. · 2008 to 2020
$3.8M
The Role of Polyadenylation in RNA TurnoverR01GM057220 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI KUSHNER, SIDNEY R. · 1999 to 2012
$3.5M
The Role of Polyadenylation in RNA TurnoverR56GM057220 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KUSHNER, SIDNEY R. · 2007 to 2007
$348k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM57220NIGMS NIH HHS GM81554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057220NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081554NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM057220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the first poly(A) polymerase (PAP) was discovered in Escherichia coli in 1962, the study of polyadenylation in bacteria was largely ignored for the next 30 years. However, with the identification of the structural gene for E. coli PAP I in 1992, it became possible to analyze polyadenylation using both biochemical and genetic approaches. Subsequently, it has been shown that polyadenylation plays a multifunctional role in prokaryotic RNA metabolism. Although the bulk of our current understanding of prokaryotic polyadenylation comes from studies on E. coli, recent limited experiments with Cyanobacteria, organelles, and Archaea have widened our view on the diversity, complexity, and universality of the polyadenylation process. For example, the identification of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), a reversible phosphorolytic enzyme that is highly conserved in bacteria, as an additional PAP in E. coli caught everyone by surprise. In fact, PNPase has now been shown to be the source of post-transcriptional RNA modifications in a wide range of cells of prokaryotic origin including those that lack a eubacterial PAP homolog. Accordingly, the past few years have witnessed increased interest in the mechanism and role of post-transcriptional modifications in all species of prokaryotic origin. However, the fact that many of the poly(A) tails are very short and unstable as well as the presence of polynucleotide tails has posed significant technical challenges to the scientific community trying to unravel the mystery of polyadenylation in prokaryotes. This review discusses the current state of knowledge regarding polyadenylation and its functions in bacteria, organelles, and Archaea.

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeaBacteriaBase SequenceHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataOrganellesPolyadenylationQuality ControlRNA StabilityHfqpoly(A) polymerasepolynucleotide phosphorylaseRNA degradation

Identifiers

PMID21344039
PMCPMC3041983
OpenAlexW2003858450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.