Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21343389›Full record

ArticleCancer research2011

Integrative genomics identifies molecular alterations that challenge the linear model of melanoma progression.

Amy E Rose, Laura Poliseno, Jinhua Wang, Michael Clark, Alexander Pearlman, Guimin Wang, Eleazar C Vega Y Saenz de Miera, Ratna Medicherla, Paul J Christos, Richard Shapiro and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Haematologica · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact ofAging · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CarcinogenicMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy E RoseDepartment of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Laura Poliseno
Jinhua Wang
Michael Clark
Alexander Pearlman
Guimin Wang
Eleazar C Vega Y Saenz de Miera
Ratna Medicherla
Paul J Christos
Richard Shapiro
Anna Pavlick
Farbod Darvishian
Jiri Zavadil
David Polsky
Eva Hernando
Harry Ostrer
Iman Osman
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group · USNew York University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024996 · NCRR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2007 to 2011
$49.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024996NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM) are believed to represent sequential phases of linear progression from radial to vertical growth. Several lines of clinical, pathologic, and epidemiologic evidence suggest, however, that SSM and NM might be the result of independent pathways of tumor development. We utilized an integrative genomic approach that combines single nucleotide polymorphism array (6.0; Affymetrix) with gene expression array (U133A 2.0; Affymetrix) to examine molecular differences between SSM and NM. Pathway analysis of the most differentially expressed genes between SSM and NM (N = 114) revealed significant differences related to metabolic processes. We identified 8 genes (DIS3, FGFR1OP, G3BP2, GALNT7, MTAP, SEC23IP, USO1, and ZNF668) in which NM/SSM-specific copy number alterations correlated with differential gene expression (P < 0.05; Spearman's rank). SSM-specific genomic deletions in G3BP2, MTAP, and SEC23IP were independently verified in two external data sets. Forced overexpression of metabolism-related gene MTAP (methylthioadenosine phosphorylase) in SSM resulted in reduced cell growth. The differential expression of another metabolic-related gene, aldehyde dehydrogenase 7A1 (ALDH7A1), was validated at the protein level by using tissue microarrays of human melanoma. In addition, we show that the decreased ALDH7A1 expression in SSM may be the result of epigenetic modifications. Our data reveal recurrent genomic deletions in SSM not present in NM, which challenge the linear model of melanoma progression. Furthermore, our data suggest a role for altered regulation of metabolism-related genes as a possible cause of the different clinical behavior of SSM and NM.

Indexed as

Aldehyde DehydrogenaseCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryLinear ModelsMelanocytesMelanomaOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsAldehyde DehydrogenaseALDH7A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21343389
PMCPMC3070783
OpenAlexW2106693434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.