Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21343262›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2011

A qualitative study of Canada's experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology.

Ronen Rozenblum, Yeona Jang, Eyal Zimlichman, Claudia Salzberg, Melissa Tamblyn, David Buckeridge, Alan Forster, David W Bates, Robyn Tamblyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The current state of electronic health records across Canada: an environmental scan and interoperability maturity assessment.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward better prescription drug surveillance in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  16. Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records in Canada: Perceptions of Stakeholders.International journal of health policy and management · 2016
    Article
  17. Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015
    Article
  18. Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronen RozenblumDivision of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA.
Yeona Jang
Eyal Zimlichman
Claudia Salzberg
Melissa Tamblyn
David Buckeridge
Alan Forster
David W Bates
Robyn Tamblyn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2001, Canada Health Infoway unveiled a plan to implement a national system of interoperable electronic health records. This government-funded corporation introduced a novel model for interprovincial/territorial collaboration to establish core aspects of a national framework. Despite this $1.6 billion initiative, Canada continues to lag behind other Western countries in adopting electronic health records. We conducted a study to identify the success of different aspects of the Canadian plan and ways to improve the adoption of electronic health records.

methodsWe used a case study approach to assess the 10-year history of Canada's e-health plan. National reports and documents were reviewed, and structured interviews were conducted with 29 key stakeholders representing national and provincial organizations responsible for establishing policy and strategic direction for health information technology. Using grounded theory, we analyzed transcripts of the interviews to identify themes and their relationships.

resultsKey stakeholders identified funding, national standards, patient registries and digital imaging as important achievements of the e-health plan. Lack of an e-health policy, inadequate involvement of clinicians, failure to establish a business case for using electronic health records, a focus on national rather than regional interoperability, and inflexibility in approach were seen as barriers to adoption of the plan.

interpretationTo accelerate adoption of electronic health records and timely return on investment, an e-health policy needs to be tightly aligned with the major strategic directions of health care reform. Adoption needs to be actively fostered through a bottom-up, clinical-needs-first approach, a national policy for investment in electronic health records, and financial incentives based on patient outcomes that can be achieved with electronic health records.

Indexed as

CanadaDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleMedical InformaticsPolicy MakingProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID21343262
PMCPMC3060213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.