ArticleNucleic acids research2011
Strand bias influences the mechanism of gene editing directed by single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RECKLEEN is a lambda Red/CRISPR-Cas9 based single plasmid platform for enhanced genome editing in Klebsiella pneumoniae.Communications biology · 2025Article
- CRISPR-DirectedThe CRISPR journal · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene editing directed by modified single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides has been used to alter a single base pair in a variety of biological systems. It is likely that gene editing is facilitated by the direct incorporation of the oligonucleotides via replication and/or by direct conversion, most likely through the DNA mismatch repair pathway. The phenomenon of strand bias, however, as well as its importance to the gene editing reaction itself, has yet to be elucidated in terms of mechanism. We have taken a reductionist approach by using a genetic readout in Eschericha coli and a plasmid-based selectable system to evaluate the influence of strand bias on the mechanism of gene editing. We show that oligonucleotides (ODNs) designed to anneal to the lagging strand generate 100-fold greater 'editing' efficiency than 'those that anneal to' the leading strand. The majority of editing events (∼70%) occur by the incorporation of the ODN during replication within the lagging strand. Conversely, ODNs that anneal to the leading strand generate fewer editing events although this event may follow either the incorporation or direct conversion pathway. In general, the influence of DNA replication is independent of which ODN is used suggesting that the importance of strand bias is a reflection of the underlying mechanism used to carry out gene editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.