ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2011
Antithymocyte treatment of steroid-resistant acute rejection in renal transplantation.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting tissue immune memory in chronic-remitting autoimmune kidney diseases: current concepts and future therapies.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Steroid-resistant acute allograft rejection in renal transplantation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the outcome of early (ER <3 months) and late (LR >3 months) episodes of corticosteroid resistant acute allograft rejection (CRR) treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in pediatric renal allograft recipients. Retrospective study of 15 children, mean age 13.2 y, who received ATG for the treatment of biopsy proven CRR over a 15 year period. Seven children received ATG for ER (median 26 days post transplantation) and 8 for LR (median 763 days). There was a significant improvement in the 3 month eGFR (70.3 ml/min/1.73m(2), SD 22.3, p = 0.018) when compared with the value prior to ATG treatment (23.3 ml/min/1.73m(2), SD 10.2) in the ER group. In the LR group (4 DSA positive) there was no improvement in the eGFR at 3 months (42 ml/min/1.73m(2), SD 10.5, p = 0.32) when compared with the value prior to ATG (38 ml/min/1.73 m(2), SD 9.7). At final review, eGFR in the ER group was 72.3 ml/min/1.73m(2) (SD 33) vs. 37.7 ml/min/1.73m(2) (SD 17.9) in the LR group after a mean follow up of 10.4 y and 1.2 y, respectively. ATG therapy in CRR is associated with reversal of rejection and excellent graft outcome in children with ER. The benefits remain uncertain in LR, the etiology of which is multifactorial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.