Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21340486›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2011

Informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents: the attitude of the Flemish paediatrician anno 2010.

Michel Deneyer, Dirk Devroey, Etienne De Groot, Ronald Buyl, Ciska Clybouw, Yvan Vandenplas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michel DeneyerUniversitair Kinderziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. michel.deneyer@uzbrussel.be
Dirk Devroey
Etienne De Groot
Ronald Buyl
Ciska Clybouw
Yvan Vandenplas
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confidentiality is a major issue in adolescent healthcare, and its perceived absence may be the main barrier for an adolescent to seek medical care. Little is known about the right on informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents in Belgium, although these rights are unambiguously foreseen in the law on patients' rights since 2002. There are no data available regarding the introduction of a private moment with the physician during a consultation, about the nature and the quantity of information made available to parents by the paediatricians regarding the health situation of adolescents and about the existence of procedures with regard to these matters. The purpose of this study is to map out the current interpretation and the attitude of the paediatrician with regard to the right to confidentiality and informative privacy. The answers of 117 Flemish paediatricians to an anonymous questionnaire were analyzed. An unaccompanied medical visit is not frequent in Belgium (only 1%). Only 35.1% of the paediatricians systematically offer the possibility to have a private conversation with an adolescent. Almost 80% of the paediatricians render, as a rule, all information to the parents. Parents are informed about sensible information regarding psychosocial aspects, including data concerning sexual behaviour, in not less than 83.2% of the consultations by adolescents. Only in 2.9% no information is given to the parents. The paediatricians employ only for 13% the procedures regarding confidentiality for minors. This study reveals that Flemish paediatricians have a paternalistic attitude concerning the right on confidentiality and informative privacy, which is not in line with the Belgian legislation. Paediatricians offer only seldom the possibility for a private conversation to the adolescent. The small incidence of unaccompanied medical consultations contributes to this. Proper application of the legal context, the handling of the watertight procedures and the necessary communication in this respect is indispensable for the confidence and will lower the barrier for adolescents to use the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelConfidentialityAdolescentAdultBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsPediatricsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrivacyProfessional-Family RelationsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21340486
OpenAlexW2091447955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.