Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21339811›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

High-resolution comparative genomic hybridization of inflammatory breast cancer and identification of candidate genes.

Ismahane Bekhouche, Pascal Finetti, José Adelaïde, Anthony Ferrari, Carole Tarpin, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Colette Charpin, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Ghislain Bidaut and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutational landscape of inflammatory breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ismahane BekhoucheMarseille Cancer Research Center (CRCM), UMR891 Inserm, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Molecular Oncology, Marseille, France.
Pascal Finetti
José Adelaïde
Anthony Ferrari
Carole Tarpin
Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret
Colette Charpin
Gilles Houvenaeghel
Jocelyne Jacquemier
Ghislain Bidaut
Daniel Birnbaum
Patrice Viens
Max Chaffanet
François Bertucci
Institut Pprime · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of BC poorly defined at the molecular level. We compared the molecular portraits of 63 IBC and 134 non-IBC (nIBC) clinical samples. METHODOLOGY/

findingsGenomic imbalances of 49 IBCs and 124 nIBCs were determined using high-resolution array-comparative genomic hybridization, and mRNA expression profiles of 197 samples using whole-genome microarrays. Genomic profiles of IBCs were as heterogeneous as those of nIBCs, and globally relatively close. However, IBCs showed more frequent "complex" patterns and a higher percentage of genes with CNAs per sample. The number of altered regions was similar in both types, although some regions were altered more frequently and/or with higher amplitude in IBCs. Many genes were similarly altered in both types; however, more genes displayed recurrent amplifications in IBCs. The percentage of genes whose mRNA expression correlated with CNAs was similar in both types for the gained genes, but ∼7-fold lower in IBCs for the lost genes. Integrated analysis identified 24 potential candidate IBC-specific genes. Their combined expression accurately distinguished IBCs and nIBCS in an independent validation set, and retained an independent prognostic value in a series of 1,781 nIBCs, reinforcing the hypothesis for a link with IBC aggressiveness. Consistent with the hyperproliferative and invasive phenotype of IBC these genes are notably involved in protein translation, cell cycle, RNA processing and transcription, metabolism, and cell migration.

conclusionsOur results suggest a higher genomic instability of IBC. We established the first repertory of DNA copy number alterations in this tumor, and provided a list of genes that may contribute to its aggressiveness and represent novel therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromosome AberrationsComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Association StudiesHumansInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21339811
PMCPMC3037286
OpenAlexW2000574364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.